Tecno Pova 5 vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Tecno Pova 5 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 50/100 (a 37-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 6000); the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 552,286); the Vivo X300 Pro is thinner (8.0mm vs 9.0mm).
Tecno Pova 5
Vivo X300 Pro
- Lighter: 219g vs 226g
- Overall rating 50/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 552286
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 727
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 2047
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 6000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 43/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 56/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 66/100)
- Better portability (43/100 vs 36/100)
Comparing the Tecno Pova 5 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 37 points higher (87/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 5 (93/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 5 (84/100 vs 66/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 5 (81/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (43/100 vs 36/100).
| Specification | Tecno Pova 5 | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G99 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 552286 | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 727 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2047 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2460 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | — | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13, HIOS 13 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 580 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 168.6×76.6×9.0 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 219 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Tecno Pova 5
- Main: —
- Front: 8MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Tecno Pova 5
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2460
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Pova 5
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Tecno Pova 5 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Tecno Pova 5 by 83.1% in our overall performance rating.
Tecno Pova 5
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 5 (93/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 5 (84/100 vs 66/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 5 (81/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (43/100 vs 36/100).
Which is better: the Tecno Pova 5 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 5 by 37 points (87/100 vs 50/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Pova 5 and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Tecno Pova 5 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Pova 5 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Pova 5 over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Tecno Pova 5 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.