OPPO Reno 16 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The OPPO Reno 16 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $515 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 79/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6700); the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 2,078,850); the OPPO Reno 16 is noticeably lighter (191g vs 230g).
OPPO Reno 16
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Lighter: 191g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $515 vs $950
- Better portability (62/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 2078850
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1553
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 6403
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6700 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 77/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 94/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 66/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 85/100)
Comparing the OPPO Reno 16 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 12 points higher (91/100 vs 79/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 77/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 66/100). Value score: OPPO Reno 16 — 82/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 (99/100 vs 77/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the OPPO Reno 16 are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the OPPO Reno 16 are nearly equal (96/100 vs 94/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 (85/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (62/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | OPPO Reno 16 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 2078850 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1553 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6403 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.3" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 2640x1216 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6700 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 191 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $515 | $950 |
OPPO Reno 16
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
OPPO Reno 16
- 6.3" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2640x1216
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
OPPO Reno 16
- 6700 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared OPPO Reno 16 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads OPPO Reno 16 by 51.1% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $435. OPPO Reno 16 was $435 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 (99/100 vs 77/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the OPPO Reno 16 are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the OPPO Reno 16 are nearly equal (96/100 vs 94/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 (85/100 vs 66/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (62/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the OPPO Reno 16 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably better than the OPPO Reno 16 — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno 16 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno 16 has a MobileRank rating of 79/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno 16 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 77/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno 16 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno 16 is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.