OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs Vivo X Fold3 Pro
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Vivo X Fold3 Pro (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; launch prices were $661 and $1499. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads — 86/100 vs 81/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5700); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 2,342,433); the Vivo X Fold3 Pro is thinner (5.2mm vs 8.2mm).
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
Vivo X Fold3 Pro
- Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 2342433
- Better Geekbench Single: 2680 vs 2205
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8358 vs 7192
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5700 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Cheaper at launch: $661 vs $1499
- Higher performance (89/100 vs 83/100)
- Better camera (94/100 vs 84/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 81/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 81/100)
- Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
- Overall rating 81/100
Comparing the OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs the Vivo X Fold3 Pro, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro scores 5 points higher (86/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 84/100). Value score: OPPO Reno 16 Pro — 84/100, Vivo X Fold3 Pro — 68/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (89/100 vs 83/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Vivo X Fold3 Pro are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Vivo X Fold3 Pro are nearly equal (83/100 vs 81/100). In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 54/100.
| Specification | OPPO Reno 16 Pro | Vivo X Fold3 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | |
| AnTuTu | 3079298 | 2342433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2680 | 2205 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8358 | 7192 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 8.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2772x1272 | 2200x2480 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 5700 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, Funtouch 15 (International), OriginOS 4 (China) | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IPX8 | |
| Dimensions | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | 160.0×142.4×5.2 mm | |
| Weight | — | 236 g | |
| Launch price | $661 | $1499 |
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X Fold3 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 32MP
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X Fold3 Pro
- 8.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2200x2480
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo X Fold3 Pro
- 5700 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
We compared OPPO Reno 16 Pro and Vivo X Fold3 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads Vivo X Fold3 Pro by 31.5% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $838. OPPO Reno 16 Pro was $838 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (89/100 vs 83/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Vivo X Fold3 Pro are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Vivo X Fold3 Pro are nearly equal (83/100 vs 81/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 54/100.
Which is better: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Vivo X Fold3 Pro?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro edges out the Vivo X Fold3 Pro by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Vivo X Fold3 Pro?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro — 81/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Vivo X Fold3 Pro?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 84/100).
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Vivo X Fold3 Pro?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on performance (89/100 vs 83/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno 16 Pro over the Vivo X Fold3 Pro?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X Fold3 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life.