OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 (2025) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2500; launch prices were $661 and $1099. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads — 86/100 vs 72/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4300); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 2,289,696); the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 is thinner (6.5mm vs 8.2mm).
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7
- Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 2289696
- Better Geekbench Single: 2680 vs 2358
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8358 vs 8211
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4300 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
- Cheaper at launch: $661 vs $1099
- Higher performance (89/100 vs 84/100)
- Better camera (94/100 vs 70/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 37/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 81/100)
- Better portability (83/100 vs 54/100)
Comparing the OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro scores 14 points higher (86/100 vs 72/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (83/100 vs 37/100). Value score: OPPO Reno 16 Pro — 84/100, Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 — 56/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 (94/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 (83/100 vs 37/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 Pro (83/100 vs 54/100).
| Specification | OPPO Reno 16 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | Samsung Exynos 2500 | |
| AnTuTu | 3079298 | 2289696 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2680 | 2358 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8358 | 8211 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2772x1272 | 2640x1080 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 4300 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 137 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | 166.7×75.2×6.5 mm | |
| Weight | — | 188 g | |
| Launch price | $661 | $1099 |
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 10MP
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2640x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7
- 4300 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared OPPO Reno 16 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 by 34.5% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $438. OPPO Reno 16 Pro was $438 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 (94/100 vs 70/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 (83/100 vs 37/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 Pro (83/100 vs 54/100).
Which is better: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 — 72/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 70/100).
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on performance (89/100 vs 84/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno 16 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.