OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A03
Comparing the OPPO Reno 16 Pro (2026) and the Samsung Galaxy A03 (2022) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads — 86/100 vs 43/100 (a 43-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 48 MP; the OPPO Reno 16 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy A03 doesn't.
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
Samsung Galaxy A03
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
- Better camera (94/100 vs 29/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 66/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 39/100)
- Better portability (54/100 vs 50/100)
- Overall rating 43/100
Comparing the OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy A03, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro scores 43 points higher (86/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (83/100 vs 66/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (84/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (94/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (83/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy A03 are nearly equal (54/100 vs 50/100).
| Specification | OPPO Reno 16 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A03 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | — | |
| AnTuTu | 3079298 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 2680 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8358 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.5" PLS TFT | |
| Resolution | 2772x1272 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 48 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 3GB / 4GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 32GB / 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 11 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | 164.2×75.9×9.1 mm | |
| Weight | — | 196 g | |
| Launch price | $661 | — |
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy A03
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 5MP
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A03
- 6.5" PLS TFT
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Samsung Galaxy A03
- 5000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Samsung Galaxy A03
Price unknowndisplay
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (84/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (94/100 vs 29/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (83/100 vs 66/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy A03 are nearly equal (54/100 vs 50/100).
Which is better: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy A03?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 by 43 points (86/100 vs 43/100).
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy A03?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Samsung Galaxy A03 — 43/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy A03?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 29/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno 16 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy A03?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy A03 is a better fit for everyday use.