Oppo K10 Energy vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Oppo K10 Energy (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 51/100 (a 18-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 783,606); the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has NFC for contactless payments, the Oppo K10 Energy doesn't; the Oppo K10 Energy is noticeably lighter (199g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Oppo K10 Energy
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Oppo K10 Energy better?
- Lighter: 199g vs 309g
- Better portability (54/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 783606
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1017
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 2943
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 30W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 54/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 43/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 45/100)
- Better display (70/100 vs 66/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Oppo K10 Energy vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 18 points higher (69/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 54/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 45/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Oppo K10 Energy (90/100 vs 54/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Oppo K10 Energy are nearly equal (70/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Oppo K10 Energy (63/100 vs 45/100). In the "portability" category, the Oppo K10 Energy significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (54/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Oppo K10 Energy | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 783606 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1017 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2943 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.2 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 600 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 164.4×75.9×8.5 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | — | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Oppo K10 Energy
- Main: 64MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Oppo K10 Energy
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Oppo K10 Energy
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Oppo K10 Energy and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Oppo K10 Energy by 73.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Oppo K10 Energy
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Oppo K10 Energy (90/100 vs 54/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Oppo K10 Energy are nearly equal (70/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Oppo K10 Energy (63/100 vs 45/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oppo K10 Energy significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (54/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Oppo K10 Energy or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is noticeably better than the Oppo K10 Energy — the overall rating gap is 18 points.
What is the rating of the Oppo K10 Energy and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Oppo K10 Energy has a MobileRank rating of 51/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Oppo K10 Energy or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 43/100).
Which is more powerful: the Oppo K10 Energy or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 54/100).
Should you choose the Oppo K10 Energy over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.