Oppo K10 Energy vs Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
The Oppo K10 Energy (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, while the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G leads — 56/100 vs 51/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 64 MP vs 108 MP; the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G has NFC for contactless payments, the Oppo K10 Energy doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G is noticeably lighter (181g vs 199g).
Oppo K10 Energy
Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
- Faster charging: 30W vs 25W
- Longer battery life (45/100 vs 44/100)
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 64MP
- Lighter: 181g vs 199g
- Better camera (51/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (79/100 vs 66/100)
- Better portability (74/100 vs 54/100)
Comparing the Oppo K10 Energy vs the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G, the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G scores 5 points higher (56/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 54/100. In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G is a bit better (79/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G is a bit better (51/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo K10 Energy and the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G are nearly equal (45/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G notably outperforms the Oppo K10 Energy (74/100 vs 54/100).
| Specification | Oppo K10 Energy | Samsung Galaxy A73 5G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G | |
| AnTuTu | 781542 | 781542 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1017 | 1017 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2943 | 2943 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.7" Super AMOLED Plus | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 25W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 108 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 12 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.2 | Android 12, One UI 4.1 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 600 nits | 800 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP67 | |
| Dimensions | 164.4×75.9×8.5 mm | 163.7×76.1×7.6 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 181 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Oppo K10 Energy
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 32MP
Oppo K10 Energy
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
- 6.7" Super AMOLED Plus
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Oppo K10 Energy
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
We compared Oppo K10 Energy and Samsung Galaxy A73 5G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 54/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G is a bit better (79/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G is a bit better (51/100 vs 43/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Oppo K10 Energy and the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G are nearly equal (45/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G notably outperforms the Oppo K10 Energy (74/100 vs 54/100).
Which is better: the Oppo K10 Energy or the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G?
The Samsung Galaxy A73 5G edges out the Oppo K10 Energy by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Oppo K10 Energy and the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G?
The Oppo K10 Energy has a MobileRank rating of 51/100, the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G — 56/100.
Which has the better camera: the Oppo K10 Energy or the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G?
The Samsung Galaxy A73 5G leads on camera score (51/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the Oppo K10 Energy over the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G?
The Oppo K10 Energy is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy A73 5G is a better fit for everyday use.