Oppo A92 vs Vivo Y32t
The Oppo A92 (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Oppo A92 leads — 36/100 vs 28/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 48 MP vs 13 MP; the Oppo A92 is faster in AnTuTu (329,457 vs 303,398).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Oppo A92
Vivo Y32t
What makes Oppo A92 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 329457 vs 303398
- Better Geekbench Multi: 1128 vs 779
- Better main camera: 48MP vs 13MP
- Higher performance (24/100 vs 20/100)
- Better camera (34/100 vs 10/100)
- Better display (58/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo Y32t better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 341 vs 321
- Lighter: 179g vs 192g
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 43/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 55/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Oppo A92 vs the Vivo Y32t, the Oppo A92 scores 8 points higher (36/100 vs 28/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo A92 leads (34/100 vs 10/100). In the "performance" category, the Oppo A92 and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (24/100 vs 20/100). In the "display" category, the Oppo A92 notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (58/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo A92 notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (34/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (68/100 vs 55/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Oppo A92 | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 329457 | 303398 | |
| Geekbench Single | 321 | 341 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1128 | 779 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | — | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | — | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | — | |
| Storage | 128GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 10; ColorOS 7.1 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| Brightness (peak) | 480 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 162.0×75.5×8.9 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 179 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Oppo A92
- Main: 48MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Oppo A92
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Oppo A92
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Oppo A92 and Vivo Y32t, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Oppo A92 leads Vivo Y32t by 8.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Oppo A92 and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (24/100 vs 20/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Oppo A92 notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (58/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Oppo A92 notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (34/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (68/100 vs 55/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Oppo A92 or the Vivo Y32t?
The Oppo A92 edges out the Vivo Y32t by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Oppo A92 and the Vivo Y32t?
The Oppo A92 has a MobileRank rating of 36/100, the Vivo Y32t — 28/100.
Which has the better camera: the Oppo A92 or the Vivo Y32t?
The Oppo A92 leads on camera score (34/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Oppo A92 over the Vivo Y32t?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is camera — better on the Oppo A92 (34/100 vs 10/100).