Motorola Moto G Fast vs Oppo A92
The Motorola Moto G Fast (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, while the Oppo A92 (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665. By overall MobileRank rating, the Oppo A92 leads — 36/100 vs 25/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the Oppo A92 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 16 MP vs 48 MP.
Motorola Moto G Fast
Oppo A92
- Lighter: 189g vs 192g
- Overall rating 25/100
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4000 mAh
- Faster charging: 18W vs 10W
- Better main camera: 48MP vs 16MP
- Better camera (34/100 vs 15/100)
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 22/100)
- Better display (58/100 vs 39/100)
- Better portability (55/100 vs 54/100)
Comparing the Motorola Moto G Fast vs the Oppo A92, the Oppo A92 scores 11 points higher (36/100 vs 25/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo A92 leads (34/100 vs 15/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo A92 leads (43/100 vs 22/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 24/100. In the "display" category, the Oppo A92 notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G Fast (58/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo A92 notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G Fast (34/100 vs 15/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo A92 notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G Fast (43/100 vs 22/100). In the "portability" category, the Oppo A92 and the Motorola Moto G Fast are nearly equal (55/100 vs 54/100).
| Specification | Motorola Moto G Fast | Oppo A92 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 | |
| AnTuTu | 329457 | 329457 | |
| Geekbench Single | 321 | 321 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1128 | 1128 | |
| Display | 6.4" IPS LCD | 6.5" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 720x1560 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | — | — | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 18W | |
| Main camera | 16 MP | 48 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 32GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 10; ColorOS 7.1 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 480 nits | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 161.9×75.7×9.1 mm | 162.0×75.5×8.9 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 192 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Motorola Moto G Fast
- Main: 16MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 8MP
Oppo A92
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Motorola Moto G Fast
- 6.4" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1560
- Refresh rate: —
Oppo A92
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Motorola Moto G Fast
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Oppo A92
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
We compared Motorola Moto G Fast and Oppo A92, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 24/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Oppo A92 notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G Fast (58/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Oppo A92 notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G Fast (34/100 vs 15/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Oppo A92 notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G Fast (43/100 vs 22/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oppo A92 and the Motorola Moto G Fast are nearly equal (55/100 vs 54/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Moto G Fast or the Oppo A92?
The Oppo A92 is noticeably better than the Motorola Moto G Fast — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G Fast and the Oppo A92?
The Motorola Moto G Fast has a MobileRank rating of 25/100, the Oppo A92 — 36/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto G Fast or the Oppo A92?
The Oppo A92 leads on camera score (34/100 vs 15/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Moto G Fast over the Oppo A92?
The Motorola Moto G Fast is a better fit for everyday use. The Oppo A92 is a better fit for everyday use.