Nokia G400 vs Oppo A92
The Nokia G400 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G, while the Oppo A92 (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665. By overall MobileRank rating, the Nokia G400 leads — 43/100 vs 36/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the Nokia G400 is faster in AnTuTu (477,542 vs 329,457); the Nokia G400 has NFC for contactless payments, the Oppo A92 doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia G400
Oppo A92
What makes Nokia G400 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 477542 vs 329457
- Better Geekbench Single: 746 vs 321
- Better Geekbench Multi: 1816 vs 1128
- Faster charging: 20W vs 18W
- Higher performance (41/100 vs 24/100)
- Better display (66/100 vs 58/100)
What makes Oppo A92 better?
- Lighter: 192g vs 198g
- Better camera (34/100 vs 33/100)
- Better portability (55/100 vs 51/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Nokia G400 vs the Oppo A92, the Nokia G400 scores 7 points higher (43/100 vs 36/100). In the "performance" category, the Nokia G400 leads (41/100 vs 24/100). In the "performance" category, the Nokia G400 notably outperforms the Oppo A92 (41/100 vs 24/100). In the "display" category, the Nokia G400 is a bit better (66/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo A92 and the Nokia G400 are nearly equal (34/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100. In the "portability" category, the Oppo A92 and the Nokia G400 are nearly equal (55/100 vs 51/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nokia G400 | Oppo A92 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 | |
| AnTuTu | 477542 | 329457 | |
| Geekbench Single | 746 | 321 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1816 | 1128 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.5" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2408 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 20W | 18W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 48 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 10; ColorOS 7.1 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 480 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 166.4×76.7×8.8 mm | 162.0×75.5×8.9 mm | |
| Weight | 198 g | 192 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Nokia G400
- Main: 48MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 16MP
Oppo A92
- Main: 48MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Nokia G400
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Oppo A92
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Nokia G400
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 20W
- No wireless charging
Oppo A92
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Nokia G400 and Oppo A92, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Nokia G400 leads Oppo A92 by 44.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Nokia G400 notably outperforms the Oppo A92 (41/100 vs 24/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Nokia G400 is a bit better (66/100 vs 58/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Oppo A92 and the Nokia G400 are nearly equal (34/100 vs 33/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100.
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oppo A92 and the Nokia G400 are nearly equal (55/100 vs 51/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia G400 or the Oppo A92?
The Nokia G400 edges out the Oppo A92 by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Nokia G400 and the Oppo A92?
The Nokia G400 has a MobileRank rating of 43/100, the Oppo A92 — 36/100.
Which is more powerful: the Nokia G400 or the Oppo A92?
The Nokia G400 leads on performance (41/100 vs 24/100).
Should you choose the Nokia G400 over the Oppo A92?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is performance — better on the Nokia G400 (41/100 vs 24/100).