Nokia XR30 vs Oppo A92
The Nokia XR30 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695, while the Oppo A92 (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665. By overall MobileRank rating, the Nokia XR30 leads — 46/100 vs 36/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Oppo A92 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4600); the main camera is 64 MP vs 48 MP; the Nokia XR30 is faster in AnTuTu (592,015 vs 329,457); the Nokia XR30 has NFC for contactless payments, the Oppo A92 doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia XR30
Oppo A92
What makes Nokia XR30 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 592015 vs 329457
- Better Geekbench Single: 905 vs 321
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2101 vs 1128
- Faster charging: 33W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 48MP
- Higher performance (46/100 vs 24/100)
- Better camera (43/100 vs 34/100)
- Better display (66/100 vs 58/100)
What makes Oppo A92 better?
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4600 mAh
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 37/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Nokia XR30 vs the Oppo A92, the Nokia XR30 scores 10 points higher (46/100 vs 36/100). In the "performance" category, the Nokia XR30 leads (46/100 vs 24/100). In the "performance" category, the Nokia XR30 notably outperforms the Oppo A92 (46/100 vs 24/100). In the "display" category, the Nokia XR30 is a bit better (66/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia XR30 is a bit better (43/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo A92 is a bit better (43/100 vs 37/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nokia XR30 | Oppo A92 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 | |
| AnTuTu | 592015 | 329457 | |
| Geekbench Single | 905 | 321 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2101 | 1128 | |
| Display | 6.7" | 6.5" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | — | — | |
| Battery | 4600 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 18W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 48 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 10; ColorOS 7.1 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 480 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | — | 162.0×75.5×8.9 mm | |
| Weight | — | 192 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Nokia XR30
- Main: 64MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Oppo A92
- Main: 48MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Nokia XR30
- 6.7"
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Oppo A92
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Nokia XR30
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Oppo A92
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Nokia XR30 and Oppo A92, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Nokia XR30 leads Oppo A92 by 79.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Nokia XR30 notably outperforms the Oppo A92 (46/100 vs 24/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Nokia XR30 is a bit better (66/100 vs 58/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nokia XR30 is a bit better (43/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Oppo A92 is a bit better (43/100 vs 37/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia XR30 or the Oppo A92?
The Nokia XR30 is noticeably better than the Oppo A92 — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
What is the rating of the Nokia XR30 and the Oppo A92?
The Nokia XR30 has a MobileRank rating of 46/100, the Oppo A92 — 36/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia XR30 or the Oppo A92?
The Nokia XR30 leads on camera score (43/100 vs 34/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nokia XR30 or the Oppo A92?
The Nokia XR30 leads on performance (46/100 vs 24/100).
Should you choose the Nokia XR30 over the Oppo A92?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is performance — better on the Nokia XR30 (46/100 vs 24/100).