Nubia Neo 3 GT vs Vivo X300s
The Nubia Neo 3 GT (2025) runs on the Unisoc T9100, while the Vivo X300s (2026) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300s leads — 89/100 vs 59/100 (a 30-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300s has the bigger battery (7100 mAh vs 6000); the Vivo X300s is faster in AnTuTu (3,703,823 vs 702,939).
Nubia Neo 3 GT
Vivo X300s
- Overall rating 59/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 3703823 vs 702939
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 872
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 2451
- Bigger battery: 7100 vs 6000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 80W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 50/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 79/100)
Comparing the Nubia Neo 3 GT vs the Vivo X300s, the Vivo X300s scores 30 points higher (89/100 vs 59/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s leads (94/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s leads (83/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Nubia Neo 3 GT (94/100 vs 50/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Nubia Neo 3 GT (94/100 vs 79/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Nubia Neo 3 GT (83/100 vs 63/100).
| Specification | Nubia Neo 3 GT | Vivo X300s | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T9100 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 702939 | 3703823 | |
| Geekbench Single | 872 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2451 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2392 | 2800x1260 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 7100 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| Main camera | — | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | — | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | — | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 / OriginOS 6 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1300 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Weight | — | 217 g | |
| Launch price | — | $723 |
Nubia Neo 3 GT
- Main: —
- Front: —
Vivo X300s
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Nubia Neo 3 GT
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2392
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300s
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Nubia Neo 3 GT
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300s
- 7100 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Nubia Neo 3 GT and Vivo X300s, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300s leads Nubia Neo 3 GT by 81.0% in our overall performance rating.
Nubia Neo 3 GT
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Nubia Neo 3 GT (94/100 vs 50/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Nubia Neo 3 GT (94/100 vs 79/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Nubia Neo 3 GT (83/100 vs 63/100).
Which is better: the Nubia Neo 3 GT or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Nubia Neo 3 GT by 30 points (89/100 vs 59/100).
What is the rating of the Nubia Neo 3 GT and the Vivo X300s?
The Nubia Neo 3 GT has a MobileRank rating of 59/100, the Vivo X300s — 89/100.
Which is more powerful: the Nubia Neo 3 GT or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s leads on performance (94/100 vs 50/100).
Should you choose the Nubia Neo 3 GT over the Vivo X300s?
The Nubia Neo 3 GT is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.