Nubia Neo 3 GT vs Vivo X Fold6
The Nubia Neo 3 GT (2025) runs on the Unisoc T9100, while the Vivo X Fold6 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X Fold6 leads — 88/100 vs 59/100 (a 29-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X Fold6 has the bigger battery (6900 mAh vs 6000); the Vivo X Fold6 is faster in AnTuTu (3,485,039 vs 702,939).
Nubia Neo 3 GT
Vivo X Fold6
- Overall rating 59/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 3485039 vs 702939
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 872
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 2451
- Bigger battery: 6900 vs 6000 mAh
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 50/100)
- Longer battery life (82/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 79/100)
Comparing the Nubia Neo 3 GT vs the Vivo X Fold6, the Vivo X Fold6 scores 29 points higher (88/100 vs 59/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (94/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (82/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Nubia Neo 3 GT (94/100 vs 50/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X Fold6 and the Nubia Neo 3 GT are nearly equal (81/100 vs 79/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Nubia Neo 3 GT (82/100 vs 63/100).
| Specification | Nubia Neo 3 GT | Vivo X Fold6 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T9100 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 702939 | 3485039 | |
| Geekbench Single | 872 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2451 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 8.0" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2392 | 2480x2200 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 6900 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| Main camera | — | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | — | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | — | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1300 nits | 5500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 159.7×142.3×4.3 mm | |
| Weight | — | — | |
| Launch price | — | $1900 |
Nubia Neo 3 GT
- Main: —
- Front: —
Vivo X Fold6
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.75
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 20MP
Nubia Neo 3 GT
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2392
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X Fold6
- 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nubia Neo 3 GT
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X Fold6
- 6900 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
We compared Nubia Neo 3 GT and Vivo X Fold6, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X Fold6 leads Nubia Neo 3 GT by 79.8% in our overall performance rating.
Nubia Neo 3 GT
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Nubia Neo 3 GT (94/100 vs 50/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X Fold6 and the Nubia Neo 3 GT are nearly equal (81/100 vs 79/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Nubia Neo 3 GT (82/100 vs 63/100).
Which is better: the Nubia Neo 3 GT or the Vivo X Fold6?
The Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Nubia Neo 3 GT by 29 points (88/100 vs 59/100).
What is the rating of the Nubia Neo 3 GT and the Vivo X Fold6?
The Nubia Neo 3 GT has a MobileRank rating of 59/100, the Vivo X Fold6 — 88/100.
Which is more powerful: the Nubia Neo 3 GT or the Vivo X Fold6?
The Vivo X Fold6 leads on performance (94/100 vs 50/100).
Should you choose the Nubia Neo 3 GT over the Vivo X Fold6?
The Nubia Neo 3 GT is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.