Nubia Neo 3 GT vs Vivo iQOO 13
The Nubia Neo 3 GT (2025) runs on the Unisoc T9100, while the Vivo iQOO 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads — 84/100 vs 59/100 (a 25-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 13 has the bigger battery (6150 mAh vs 6000); the Vivo iQOO 13 is faster in AnTuTu (3,119,308 vs 702,939).
Nubia Neo 3 GT
Vivo iQOO 13
- Overall rating 59/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 3119308 vs 702939
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 872
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 2451
- Bigger battery: 6150 vs 6000 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 80W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 50/100)
- Longer battery life (73/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 79/100)
Comparing the Nubia Neo 3 GT vs the Vivo iQOO 13, the Vivo iQOO 13 scores 25 points higher (84/100 vs 59/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (92/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (73/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Nubia Neo 3 GT (92/100 vs 50/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Nubia Neo 3 GT (99/100 vs 79/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 is a bit better (73/100 vs 63/100).
| Specification | Nubia Neo 3 GT | Vivo iQOO 13 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T9100 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 702939 | 3119308 | |
| Geekbench Single | 872 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2451 | 9494 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2392 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 6150 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 120W | |
| Main camera | — | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | — | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | — | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China) | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1300 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | — | 207 g | |
| Launch price | — | $650 |
Nubia Neo 3 GT
- Main: —
- Front: —
Vivo iQOO 13
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Nubia Neo 3 GT
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2392
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Nubia Neo 3 GT
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6150 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
We compared Nubia Neo 3 GT and Vivo iQOO 13, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 13 leads Nubia Neo 3 GT by 77.5% in our overall performance rating.
Nubia Neo 3 GT
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Nubia Neo 3 GT (92/100 vs 50/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Nubia Neo 3 GT (99/100 vs 79/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 is a bit better (73/100 vs 63/100).
Which is better: the Nubia Neo 3 GT or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Nubia Neo 3 GT by 25 points (84/100 vs 59/100).
What is the rating of the Nubia Neo 3 GT and the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Nubia Neo 3 GT has a MobileRank rating of 59/100, the Vivo iQOO 13 — 84/100.
Which is more powerful: the Nubia Neo 3 GT or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on performance (92/100 vs 50/100).
Should you choose the Nubia Neo 3 GT over the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Nubia Neo 3 GT is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.