Nubia Neo 3 GT vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Nubia Neo 3 GT (2025) runs on the Unisoc T9100, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 59/100 (a 28-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 6000); the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 702,939).
Nubia Neo 3 GT
Vivo X300 Pro
- Overall rating 59/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 702939
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 872
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 2451
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 6000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 80W
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 50/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 79/100)
Comparing the Nubia Neo 3 GT vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 28 points higher (87/100 vs 59/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nubia Neo 3 GT (93/100 vs 50/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Nubia Neo 3 GT (81/100 vs 63/100).
| Specification | Nubia Neo 3 GT | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T9100 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 702939 | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 872 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2451 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2392 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | — | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | — | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | — | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1300 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | — | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Nubia Neo 3 GT
- Main: —
- Front: —
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Nubia Neo 3 GT
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2392
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nubia Neo 3 GT
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Nubia Neo 3 GT and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Nubia Neo 3 GT by 78.5% in our overall performance rating.
Nubia Neo 3 GT
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nubia Neo 3 GT (93/100 vs 50/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Nubia Neo 3 GT (81/100 vs 63/100).
Which is better: the Nubia Neo 3 GT or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nubia Neo 3 GT by 28 points (87/100 vs 59/100).
What is the rating of the Nubia Neo 3 GT and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Nubia Neo 3 GT has a MobileRank rating of 59/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which is more powerful: the Nubia Neo 3 GT or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 50/100).
Should you choose the Nubia Neo 3 GT over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Nubia Neo 3 GT is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.