Nubia Neo 3 GT vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Nubia Neo 3 GT (2025) runs on the Unisoc T9100, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 59/100 (a 32-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6000); the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 702,939).
Nubia Neo 3 GT
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Overall rating 59/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 702939
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 872
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2451
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 50/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 79/100)
Comparing the Nubia Neo 3 GT vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 32 points higher (91/100 vs 59/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nubia Neo 3 GT (99/100 vs 50/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Nubia Neo 3 GT (85/100 vs 63/100).
| Specification | Nubia Neo 3 GT | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T9100 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 702939 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 872 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2451 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2392 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | — | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | — | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | — | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1300 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | — | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | — | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Nubia Neo 3 GT
- Main: —
- Front: —
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Nubia Neo 3 GT
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2392
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nubia Neo 3 GT
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Nubia Neo 3 GT and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Nubia Neo 3 GT by 83.5% in our overall performance rating.
Nubia Neo 3 GT
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nubia Neo 3 GT (99/100 vs 50/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Nubia Neo 3 GT (85/100 vs 63/100).
Which is better: the Nubia Neo 3 GT or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nubia Neo 3 GT by 32 points (91/100 vs 59/100).
What is the rating of the Nubia Neo 3 GT and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Nubia Neo 3 GT has a MobileRank rating of 59/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which is more powerful: the Nubia Neo 3 GT or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 50/100).
Should you choose the Nubia Neo 3 GT over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Nubia Neo 3 GT is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.