Nokia XR30 vs Realme C65 4G
The Nokia XR30 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695, while the Realme C65 4G (2024) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85. By overall MobileRank rating, the Nokia XR30 leads — 46/100 vs 36/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Realme C65 4G has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4600); the main camera is 64 MP vs 50 MP; the Nokia XR30 is faster in AnTuTu (592,015 vs 348,562).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia XR30
Realme C65 4G
What makes Nokia XR30 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 592015 vs 348562
- Better Geekbench Single: 905 vs 419
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2101 vs 1461
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (46/100 vs 29/100)
- Better camera (43/100 vs 30/100)
- Better display (66/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Realme C65 4G better?
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4600 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 33W
- Longer battery life (48/100 vs 37/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Nokia XR30 vs the Realme C65 4G, the Nokia XR30 scores 10 points higher (46/100 vs 36/100). In the "performance" category, the Nokia XR30 leads (46/100 vs 29/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia XR30 leads (43/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme C65 4G leads (48/100 vs 37/100). In the "performance" category, the Nokia XR30 notably outperforms the Realme C65 4G (46/100 vs 29/100). In the "display" category, the Nokia XR30 notably outperforms the Realme C65 4G (66/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia XR30 is a bit better (43/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme C65 4G is a bit better (48/100 vs 37/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nokia XR30 | Realme C65 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | MediaTek Helio G85 | |
| AnTuTu | 592015 | 348562 | |
| Geekbench Single | 905 | 419 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2101 | 1461 | |
| Display | 6.7" | 6.7" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 720x1604 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4600 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 45W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 625 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | — | 164.6×76.1×7.6 mm | |
| Weight | — | 185 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Nokia XR30
- Main: 64MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Realme C65 4G
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Nokia XR30
- 6.7"
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Realme C65 4G
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1604
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Battery and charging
Nokia XR30
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Realme C65 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Nokia XR30 and Realme C65 4G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Nokia XR30 leads Realme C65 4G by 69.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Nokia XR30 notably outperforms the Realme C65 4G (46/100 vs 29/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Nokia XR30 notably outperforms the Realme C65 4G (66/100 vs 43/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nokia XR30 is a bit better (43/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Realme C65 4G is a bit better (48/100 vs 37/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia XR30 or the Realme C65 4G?
The Nokia XR30 is noticeably better than the Realme C65 4G — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
What is the rating of the Nokia XR30 and the Realme C65 4G?
The Nokia XR30 has a MobileRank rating of 46/100, the Realme C65 4G — 36/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia XR30 or the Realme C65 4G?
The Nokia XR30 leads on camera score (43/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nokia XR30 or the Realme C65 4G?
The Nokia XR30 leads on performance (46/100 vs 29/100).
Should you choose the Nokia XR30 over the Realme C65 4G?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is display — better on the Nokia XR30 (66/100 vs 43/100).