Nokia G310 vs Realme C65 4G
The Nokia G310 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G, while the Realme C65 4G (2024) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85. By overall MobileRank rating, the Nokia G310 leads — 39/100 vs 36/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Nokia G310 is faster in AnTuTu (477,542 vs 346,495); the Realme C65 4G has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia G310 doesn't; the Realme C65 4G is thinner (7.6mm vs 8.6mm).
Nokia G310
Realme C65 4G
- Higher AnTuTu: 477542 vs 346495
- Better Geekbench Single: 746 vs 420
- Better Geekbench Multi: 1816 vs 1364
- Higher performance (41/100 vs 29/100)
- Better display (44/100 vs 43/100)
- Faster charging: 45W vs 20W
- Lighter: 185g vs 195g
- Longer battery life (48/100 vs 43/100)
- Better portability (72/100 vs 56/100)
Comparing the Nokia G310 vs the Realme C65 4G, the Nokia G310 scores 3 points higher (39/100 vs 36/100). In the "performance" category, the Nokia G310 leads (41/100 vs 29/100). In the "performance" category, the Nokia G310 is a bit better (41/100 vs 29/100). In the "display" category, the Nokia G310 and the Realme C65 4G are nearly equal (44/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100. In the "battery" category, the Realme C65 4G is a bit better (48/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Realme C65 4G notably outperforms the Nokia G310 (72/100 vs 56/100).
| Specification | Nokia G310 | Realme C65 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G | MediaTek Helio G85 | |
| AnTuTu | 477542 | 346495 | |
| Geekbench Single | 746 | 420 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1816 | 1364 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.7" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 720x1612 | 720x1604 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 20W | 45W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 625 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 165.1×75.7×8.6 mm | 164.6×76.1×7.6 mm | |
| Weight | 195 g | 185 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Nokia G310
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Realme C65 4G
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Nokia G310
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Realme C65 4G
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1604
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Nokia G310
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 20W
- No wireless charging
Realme C65 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
We compared Nokia G310 and Realme C65 4G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Nokia G310 leads Realme C65 4G by 37.8% in our overall performance rating.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Nokia G310 is a bit better (41/100 vs 29/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Nokia G310 and the Realme C65 4G are nearly equal (44/100 vs 43/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Realme C65 4G is a bit better (48/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Realme C65 4G notably outperforms the Nokia G310 (72/100 vs 56/100).
Which is better: the Nokia G310 or the Realme C65 4G?
The Nokia G310 edges out the Realme C65 4G by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Nokia G310 and the Realme C65 4G?
The Nokia G310 has a MobileRank rating of 39/100, the Realme C65 4G — 36/100.
Which is more powerful: the Nokia G310 or the Realme C65 4G?
The Nokia G310 leads on performance (41/100 vs 29/100).
Should you choose the Nokia G310 over the Realme C65 4G?
The Nokia G310 is a better fit for everyday use. The Realme C65 4G is a better fit for everyday use.