Nokia 8 V 5G UW vs Realme C65 4G

The Nokia 8 V 5G UW (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, while the Realme C65 4G (2024) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85. By overall MobileRank rating, the Realme C65 4G leads — 27/100 vs 18/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the Realme C65 4G has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 64 MP vs 50 MP; the Nokia 8 V 5G UW is faster in AnTuTu (597,974 vs 346,495); the Realme C65 4G is noticeably lighter (185g vs 230g).

The Realme C65 4G edges out the Nokia 8 V 5G UW by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
Performance 0
Display 0
Camera 45
Battery 24
Design 12
Value for money 55
Realme C65 4G
Performance 0
Display 50
Camera 24
Battery 42
Design 68
Value for money 100
What makes Nokia 8 V 5G UW better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 597974 vs 346495
  • Better Geekbench Single: 799 vs 420
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 1836 vs 1364
  • Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP

  • Better camera (45/100 vs 24/100)
What makes Realme C65 4G better?
  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
  • Faster charging: 45W vs 18W
  • Lighter: 185g vs 230g

  • Longer battery life (42/100 vs 24/100)
  • Better display (50/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better design/ergonomics (68/100 vs 12/100)
  • Better value for money (100/100 vs 55/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Nokia 8 V 5G UW vs the Realme C65 4G, the Realme C65 4G scores 9 points higher (27/100 vs 18/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW leads (45/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme C65 4G leads (42/100 vs 24/100). In the "value for money" category, the Realme C65 4G leads (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Realme C65 4G significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW notably outperforms the Realme C65 4G (45/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme C65 4G notably outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (42/100 vs 24/100). In the "design" category, the Realme C65 4G significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (68/100 vs 12/100). In the "value for money" category, the Realme C65 4G significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (100/100 vs 55/100).

Nokia 8 V 5G UW: The Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better fit for everyday use.
Realme C65 4G: The Realme C65 4G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Nokia 8 V 5G UW Realme C65 4G
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G MediaTek Helio G85
AnTuTu 597974 346495
Geekbench Single 799 420
Geekbench Multi 1836 1364
Display 6.0" IPS LCD 6.7" IPS LCD
Resolution 1080x2400 720x1604
Refresh rate 90 Hz
Battery 4500 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 18W 45W
Main camera 64 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 0 MP
Front camera 24 MP 8 MP
RAM 6GB 6GB / 8GB
Storage 64GB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 10 Android 14, Realme UI 5.0
Brightness (peak) 625 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP54
Dimensions 171.9×78.6×9.0 mm 164.6×76.1×7.6 mm
Weight 230 g 185 g
Price $125
Camera comparison
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
  • Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Front: 24MP
45
camera
Realme C65 4G
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Front: 8MP
24
camera
Display comparison
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
  • 6.0" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: —
0
display
Realme C65 4G
  • 6.7" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1604
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
50
display
Battery and charging
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
  • 4500 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
24
battery
Realme C65 4G
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
42
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Nokia 8 V 5G UW and Realme C65 4G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Nokia 8 V 5G UW Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
18/100
597974 AnTuTu
Realme C65 4G MediaTek Helio G85
27/100 -72.6%
346495 AnTuTu

Nokia 8 V 5G UW leads Realme C65 4G by 72.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
Price unknown
Realme C65 4G
$125
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.

display

In the "display" category, the Realme C65 4G significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (50/100 vs 0/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW notably outperforms the Realme C65 4G (45/100 vs 24/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Realme C65 4G notably outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (42/100 vs 24/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Realme C65 4G significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (68/100 vs 12/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Realme C65 4G significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (100/100 vs 55/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia 8 V 5G UW or the Realme C65 4G?

The Realme C65 4G edges out the Nokia 8 V 5G UW by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Nokia 8 V 5G UW and the Realme C65 4G?

The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a MobileRank rating of 18/100, the Realme C65 4G — 27/100.

Which has the better camera: the Nokia 8 V 5G UW or the Realme C65 4G?

The Nokia 8 V 5G UW leads on camera score (45/100 vs 24/100).

Should you choose the Nokia 8 V 5G UW over the Realme C65 4G?

The Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better fit for everyday use. The Realme C65 4G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.