Nokia C31 vs Poco C65
The Nokia C31 (2022) runs on the Unisoc, while the Poco C65 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco C65 leads — 25/100 vs 10/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Nokia C31 has the bigger battery (5050 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 13 MP vs 50 MP; the Poco C65 has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia C31 doesn't.
Nokia C31
Poco C65
- Bigger battery: 5050 vs 5000 mAh
- Longer battery life (37/100 vs 36/100)
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Lighter: 192g vs 200g
- Better camera (24/100 vs 0/100)
- Better display (50/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (60/100 vs 50/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Nokia C31 vs the Poco C65, the Poco C65 scores 15 points higher (25/100 vs 10/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco C65 leads (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco C65 leads (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Poco C65 significantly outperforms the Nokia C31 (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco C65 notably outperforms the Nokia C31 (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Nokia C31 and the Poco C65 are nearly equal (37/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Poco C65 is a bit better (60/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco C65 significantly outperforms the Nokia C31 (100/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Nokia C31 | Poco C65 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc | MediaTek Helio G85 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 262000 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 375 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1031 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.7" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1600x720 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5050 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 18W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB / 4GB | 4GB / 6GB | |
| Storage | 32GB / 64GB / 128GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 13 / HyperOS | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 600 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Dimensions | — | 168.0×78.0×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 200 g | 192 g | |
| Price | — | $99 |
Nokia C31
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Poco C65
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Nokia C31
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Poco C65
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1600x720
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Nokia C31
- 5050 mAh
- No wireless charging
Poco C65
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Nokia C31
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Poco C65 significantly outperforms the Nokia C31 (50/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco C65 notably outperforms the Nokia C31 (24/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Nokia C31 and the Poco C65 are nearly equal (37/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Poco C65 is a bit better (60/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Poco C65 significantly outperforms the Nokia C31 (100/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Nokia C31 or the Poco C65?
The Poco C65 is noticeably better than the Nokia C31 — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Nokia C31 and the Poco C65?
The Nokia C31 has a MobileRank rating of 10/100, the Poco C65 — 25/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia C31 or the Poco C65?
The Poco C65 leads on camera score (24/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Nokia C31 over the Poco C65?
The Nokia C31 is a better fit for everyday use. The Poco C65 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.