Poco C65 vs ZTE V40 Pro
The Poco C65 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85, while the ZTE V40 Pro (2022) runs on the Unisoc Tiger T618. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco C65 leads — 25/100 vs 22/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE V40 Pro has the bigger battery (5100 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the Poco C65 has NFC for contactless payments, the ZTE V40 Pro doesn't.
Poco C65
ZTE V40 Pro
- Better display (50/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 55/100)
- Bigger battery: 5100 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 65W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 190g vs 192g
- Better camera (37/100 vs 24/100)
- Longer battery life (50/100 vs 36/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (62/100 vs 60/100)
Comparing the Poco C65 vs the ZTE V40 Pro, the Poco C65 scores 3 points higher (25/100 vs 22/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE V40 Pro leads (37/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE V40 Pro leads (50/100 vs 36/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco C65 leads (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Poco C65 significantly outperforms the ZTE V40 Pro (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE V40 Pro is a bit better (37/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE V40 Pro is a bit better (50/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the ZTE V40 Pro and the Poco C65 are nearly equal (62/100 vs 60/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco C65 significantly outperforms the ZTE V40 Pro (100/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Poco C65 | ZTE V40 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G85 | Unisoc Tiger T618 | |
| AnTuTu | 262000 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 375 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1031 | — | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1600x720 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5100 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 65W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 6GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13 / HyperOS | Android 11 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 168.0×78.0×8.1 mm | 163.9×76.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 190 g | |
| Price | $99 | — |
Poco C65
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
ZTE V40 Pro
- Main: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Poco C65
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1600x720
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
ZTE V40 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Poco C65
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
ZTE V40 Pro
- 5100 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- No wireless charging
ZTE V40 Pro
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Poco C65 significantly outperforms the ZTE V40 Pro (50/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE V40 Pro is a bit better (37/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE V40 Pro is a bit better (50/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the ZTE V40 Pro and the Poco C65 are nearly equal (62/100 vs 60/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Poco C65 significantly outperforms the ZTE V40 Pro (100/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Poco C65 or the ZTE V40 Pro?
The Poco C65 edges out the ZTE V40 Pro by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Poco C65 and the ZTE V40 Pro?
The Poco C65 has a MobileRank rating of 25/100, the ZTE V40 Pro — 22/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco C65 or the ZTE V40 Pro?
The ZTE V40 Pro leads on camera score (37/100 vs 24/100).
Should you choose the Poco C65 over the ZTE V40 Pro?
The Poco C65 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE V40 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.