Poco C65 vs ZTE Voyage 40 5G
The Poco C65 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85, while the ZTE Voyage 40 5G (2023) runs on the Unisoc T7520 (Tanggula T760). By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco C65 leads — 25/100 vs 10/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Poco C65 has NFC for contactless payments, the ZTE Voyage 40 5G doesn't.
Poco C65
ZTE Voyage 40 5G
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (24/100 vs 0/100)
- Better display (50/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (60/100 vs 50/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 55/100)
- Overall rating 10/100
Comparing the Poco C65 vs the ZTE Voyage 40 5G, the Poco C65 scores 15 points higher (25/100 vs 10/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco C65 leads (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco C65 leads (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Poco C65 significantly outperforms the ZTE Voyage 40 5G (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco C65 notably outperforms the ZTE Voyage 40 5G (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 36/100. In the "design" category, the Poco C65 is a bit better (60/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco C65 significantly outperforms the ZTE Voyage 40 5G (100/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Poco C65 | ZTE Voyage 40 5G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G85 | Unisoc T7520 (Tanggula T760) | |
| AnTuTu | 262000 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 375 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1031 | — | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | — | |
| Resolution | 1600x720 | — | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | — | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 64GB | |
| OS | Android 13 / HyperOS | Android 13 Tiramisu | |
| Brightness (peak) | 600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 168.0×78.0×8.1 mm | 163.6×75.2×8.5 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | — | |
| Price | $99 | — |
Poco C65
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
ZTE Voyage 40 5G
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Poco C65
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1600x720
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
ZTE Voyage 40 5G
- Refresh rate: —
Poco C65
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Voyage 40 5G
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
ZTE Voyage 40 5G
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Poco C65 significantly outperforms the ZTE Voyage 40 5G (50/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco C65 notably outperforms the ZTE Voyage 40 5G (24/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 36/100.
design
In the "design" category, the Poco C65 is a bit better (60/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Poco C65 significantly outperforms the ZTE Voyage 40 5G (100/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Poco C65 or the ZTE Voyage 40 5G?
The Poco C65 is noticeably better than the ZTE Voyage 40 5G — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Poco C65 and the ZTE Voyage 40 5G?
The Poco C65 has a MobileRank rating of 25/100, the ZTE Voyage 40 5G — 10/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco C65 or the ZTE Voyage 40 5G?
The Poco C65 leads on camera score (24/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Poco C65 over the ZTE Voyage 40 5G?
The Poco C65 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Voyage 40 5G is a better fit for everyday use.