Nokia C300 vs Oppo Reno6 Lite
The Nokia C300 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, while the Oppo Reno6 Lite (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 662. By overall MobileRank rating, the Oppo Reno6 Lite leads — 18/100 vs 7/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the Oppo Reno6 Lite has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 13 MP vs 48 MP; the Oppo Reno6 Lite is noticeably lighter (175g vs 190g).
Nokia C300
Oppo Reno6 Lite
- Overall rating 7/100
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4000 mAh
- Faster charging: 33W vs 10W
- Better main camera: 48MP vs 13MP
- Lighter: 175g vs 190g
- Better camera (26/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (39/100 vs 12/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (81/100 vs 62/100)
Comparing the Nokia C300 vs the Oppo Reno6 Lite, the Oppo Reno6 Lite scores 11 points higher (18/100 vs 7/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno6 Lite leads (26/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno6 Lite leads (39/100 vs 12/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno6 Lite notably outperforms the Nokia C300 (26/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno6 Lite notably outperforms the Nokia C300 (39/100 vs 12/100). In the "design" category, the Oppo Reno6 Lite notably outperforms the Nokia C300 (81/100 vs 62/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Nokia C300 | Oppo Reno6 Lite | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 | |
| AnTuTu | 320666 | 320666 | |
| Geekbench Single | 345 | 345 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1065 | 1065 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.4" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | — | — | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 33W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 48 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB | 6GB | |
| Storage | 32GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 400 nits | 800 nits | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 166.7×76.6×8.6 mm | 160.3×73.8×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 190 g | 175 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Nokia C300
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Oppo Reno6 Lite
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.7
- Front: 16MP
Nokia C300
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Oppo Reno6 Lite
- 6.4" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Nokia C300
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Oppo Reno6 Lite
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
We compared Nokia C300 and Oppo Reno6 Lite, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno6 Lite notably outperforms the Nokia C300 (26/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno6 Lite notably outperforms the Nokia C300 (39/100 vs 12/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Oppo Reno6 Lite notably outperforms the Nokia C300 (81/100 vs 62/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Nokia C300 or the Oppo Reno6 Lite?
The Oppo Reno6 Lite is noticeably better than the Nokia C300 — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
What is the rating of the Nokia C300 and the Oppo Reno6 Lite?
The Nokia C300 has a MobileRank rating of 7/100, the Oppo Reno6 Lite — 18/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia C300 or the Oppo Reno6 Lite?
The Oppo Reno6 Lite leads on camera score (26/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Nokia C300 over the Oppo Reno6 Lite?
The Nokia C300 is a better fit for everyday use. The Oppo Reno6 Lite is a better fit for everyday use.