Nokia X30 vs Oppo Reno6 Lite
The Nokia X30 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, while the Oppo Reno6 Lite (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 662. By overall MobileRank rating, the Nokia X30 leads — 23/100 vs 18/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Oppo Reno6 Lite has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4200); the main camera is 50 MP vs 48 MP; the Nokia X30 is faster in AnTuTu (592,015 vs 320,666); the Nokia X30 has NFC for contactless payments, the Oppo Reno6 Lite doesn't.
Nokia X30
Oppo Reno6 Lite
- Higher AnTuTu: 592015 vs 320666
- Better Geekbench Single: 905 vs 345
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2003 vs 1065
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Better camera (33/100 vs 26/100)
- Better display (50/100 vs 0/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4200 mAh
- Lighter: 175g vs 185g
- Longer battery life (39/100 vs 20/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (81/100 vs 68/100)
Comparing the Nokia X30 vs the Oppo Reno6 Lite, the Nokia X30 scores 5 points higher (23/100 vs 18/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno6 Lite leads (39/100 vs 20/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Nokia X30 significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno6 Lite (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia X30 is a bit better (33/100 vs 26/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno6 Lite notably outperforms the Nokia X30 (39/100 vs 20/100). In the "design" category, the Oppo Reno6 Lite is a bit better (81/100 vs 68/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Nokia X30 | Oppo Reno6 Lite | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 | |
| AnTuTu | 592015 | 320666 | |
| Geekbench Single | 905 | 345 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2003 | 1065 | |
| Display | 6.4" AMOLED | 6.4" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 4200 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 33W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 6GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 700 nits | 800 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP67 | — | |
| Dimensions | 158.9×73.9×8.0 mm | 160.3×73.8×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 185 g | 175 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Nokia X30
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 16MP
Oppo Reno6 Lite
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.7
- Front: 16MP
Nokia X30
- 6.4" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Oppo Reno6 Lite
- 6.4" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Nokia X30
- 4200 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Oppo Reno6 Lite
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
We compared Nokia X30 and Oppo Reno6 Lite, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Nokia X30 leads Oppo Reno6 Lite by 84.6% in our overall performance rating.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Nokia X30 significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno6 Lite (50/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nokia X30 is a bit better (33/100 vs 26/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno6 Lite notably outperforms the Nokia X30 (39/100 vs 20/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Oppo Reno6 Lite is a bit better (81/100 vs 68/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Nokia X30 or the Oppo Reno6 Lite?
The Nokia X30 edges out the Oppo Reno6 Lite by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Nokia X30 and the Oppo Reno6 Lite?
The Nokia X30 has a MobileRank rating of 23/100, the Oppo Reno6 Lite — 18/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia X30 or the Oppo Reno6 Lite?
The Nokia X30 leads on camera score (33/100 vs 26/100).
Should you choose the Nokia X30 over the Oppo Reno6 Lite?
The Nokia X30 is a better fit for everyday use. The Oppo Reno6 Lite is a better fit for everyday use.