Nokia G400 vs Oppo Reno6 Lite
The Nokia G400 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G, while the Oppo Reno6 Lite (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 662. By overall MobileRank rating, the Nokia G400 leads — 43/100 vs 40/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Nokia G400 is faster in AnTuTu (477,542 vs 320,666); the Nokia G400 has NFC for contactless payments, the Oppo Reno6 Lite doesn't; the Oppo Reno6 Lite is noticeably lighter (175g vs 198g).
Nokia G400
Oppo Reno6 Lite
- Higher AnTuTu: 477542 vs 320666
- Better Geekbench Single: 746 vs 345
- Better Geekbench Multi: 1816 vs 1065
- Higher performance (41/100 vs 24/100)
- Better camera (33/100 vs 31/100)
- Faster charging: 33W vs 20W
- Lighter: 175g vs 198g
- Longer battery life (46/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 66/100)
- Better portability (74/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Nokia G400 vs the Oppo Reno6 Lite, the Nokia G400 scores 3 points higher (43/100 vs 40/100). In the "performance" category, the Nokia G400 leads (41/100 vs 24/100). In the "performance" category, the Nokia G400 notably outperforms the Oppo Reno6 Lite (41/100 vs 24/100). In the "display" category, the Oppo Reno6 Lite notably outperforms the Nokia G400 (84/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia G400 and the Oppo Reno6 Lite are nearly equal (33/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno6 Lite and the Nokia G400 are nearly equal (46/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno6 Lite notably outperforms the Nokia G400 (74/100 vs 51/100).
| Specification | Nokia G400 | Oppo Reno6 Lite | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 | |
| AnTuTu | 477542 | 320666 | |
| Geekbench Single | 746 | 345 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1816 | 1065 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.4" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2408 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 20W | 33W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 48 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 6GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 800 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 166.4×76.7×8.8 mm | 160.3×73.8×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 198 g | 175 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Nokia G400
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 16MP
Oppo Reno6 Lite
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.7
- Front: 16MP
Nokia G400
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Oppo Reno6 Lite
- 6.4" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Nokia G400
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 20W
- No wireless charging
Oppo Reno6 Lite
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
We compared Nokia G400 and Oppo Reno6 Lite, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Nokia G400 leads Oppo Reno6 Lite by 48.9% in our overall performance rating.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Nokia G400 notably outperforms the Oppo Reno6 Lite (41/100 vs 24/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Oppo Reno6 Lite notably outperforms the Nokia G400 (84/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nokia G400 and the Oppo Reno6 Lite are nearly equal (33/100 vs 31/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno6 Lite and the Nokia G400 are nearly equal (46/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno6 Lite notably outperforms the Nokia G400 (74/100 vs 51/100).
Which is better: the Nokia G400 or the Oppo Reno6 Lite?
The Nokia G400 edges out the Oppo Reno6 Lite by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Nokia G400 and the Oppo Reno6 Lite?
The Nokia G400 has a MobileRank rating of 43/100, the Oppo Reno6 Lite — 40/100.
Which is more powerful: the Nokia G400 or the Oppo Reno6 Lite?
The Nokia G400 leads on performance (41/100 vs 24/100).
Should you choose the Nokia G400 over the Oppo Reno6 Lite?
The Nokia G400 is a better fit for everyday use. The Oppo Reno6 Lite is a better fit for everyday use.