Nokia C300 vs Vivo Y32t
The Nokia C300 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y32t leads — 11/100 vs 7/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y32t has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4000).
Nokia C300
Vivo Y32t
- Overall rating 7/100
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4000 mAh
- Lighter: 179g vs 190g
- Longer battery life (36/100 vs 12/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (76/100 vs 62/100)
Comparing the Nokia C300 vs the Vivo Y32t, the Vivo Y32t scores 4 points higher (11/100 vs 7/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t leads (36/100 vs 12/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Nokia C300 (36/100 vs 12/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (76/100 vs 62/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Nokia C300 | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 320666 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 345 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1065 | — | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | — | — | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | — | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB | — | |
| Storage | 32GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| Brightness (peak) | 400 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 166.7×76.6×8.6 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 190 g | 179 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Nokia C300
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Nokia C300
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Nokia C300
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Nokia C300 (36/100 vs 12/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (76/100 vs 62/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Nokia C300 or the Vivo Y32t?
The Vivo Y32t edges out the Nokia C300 by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Nokia C300 and the Vivo Y32t?
The Nokia C300 has a MobileRank rating of 7/100, the Vivo Y32t — 11/100.
Should you choose the Nokia C300 over the Vivo Y32t?
The Nokia C300 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use.