Nokia C300 vs Vivo Y32t
The Nokia C300 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y32t leads — 28/100 vs 24/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y32t has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4000); the Nokia C300 is faster in AnTuTu (320,666 vs 303,398).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia C300
Vivo Y32t
What makes Nokia C300 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 320666 vs 303398
- Better Geekbench Single: 345 vs 341
- Better Geekbench Multi: 1065 vs 779
- Higher performance (24/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Vivo Y32t better?
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4000 mAh
- Lighter: 179g vs 190g
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 22/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 59/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Nokia C300 vs the Vivo Y32t, the Vivo Y32t scores 4 points higher (28/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t leads (52/100 vs 22/100). In the "performance" category, the Nokia C300 and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (24/100 vs 20/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 39/100. In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 (52/100 vs 22/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (68/100 vs 59/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nokia C300 | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 320666 | 303398 | |
| Geekbench Single | 345 | 341 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1065 | 779 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | — | — | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | — | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB | — | |
| Storage | 32GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| Brightness (peak) | 400 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 166.7×76.6×8.6 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 190 g | 179 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Nokia C300
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Nokia C300
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Nokia C300
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Nokia C300 and Vivo Y32t, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Nokia C300 leads Vivo Y32t by 5.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Nokia C300 and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (24/100 vs 20/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 39/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 (52/100 vs 22/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (68/100 vs 59/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia C300 or the Vivo Y32t?
The Vivo Y32t edges out the Nokia C300 by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Nokia C300 and the Vivo Y32t?
The Nokia C300 has a MobileRank rating of 24/100, the Vivo Y32t — 28/100.
Should you choose the Nokia C300 over the Vivo Y32t?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is battery life — better on the Vivo Y32t (52/100 vs 22/100).