Nokia C300 vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Nokia C300 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 24/100 (a 67-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 13 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 320,666); the Vivo X300 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia C300 doesn't; the Nokia C300 is noticeably lighter (190g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 by 67 points (91/100 vs 24/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia C300
Performance 24
Display 39
Camera 10
Battery 22
Portability 59
Value for money
Vivo X300 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94
What makes Nokia C300 better?
  • Lighter: 190g vs 230g

  • Better portability (59/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 320666
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 345
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 1065
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 10W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 24/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 10/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 22/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 39/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Nokia C300 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 67 points higher (91/100 vs 24/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 24/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 22/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 (99/100 vs 24/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 (89/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 (85/100 vs 22/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia C300 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (59/100 vs 39/100).

Nokia C300: The Nokia C300 is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Nokia C300 Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 320666 4247433
Geekbench Single 345 3640
Geekbench Multi 1065 11033
Display 6.5" IPS LCD 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 720x1600 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz
Battery 4000 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 10W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 170
Main camera 13 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 8 MP 32 MP
RAM 3GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 32GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 12 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 400 nits
NFC no yes
Protection IP69
Dimensions 166.7×76.6×8.6 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 190 g 230 g
Launch price $950
Camera comparison
Nokia C300
  • Main: 13MP
  • Front: 8MP
10
camera
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Nokia C300
  • 6.5" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: —
39
display
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Nokia C300
  • 4000 mAh
  • Wired: 10W
  • No wireless charging
22
battery
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Nokia C300 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Nokia C300 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
24/100
320666 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +92.5%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Nokia C300 by 92.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Nokia C300
Price unknown
Vivo X300 Ultra
$950
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 (99/100 vs 24/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 (89/100 vs 39/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 (96/100 vs 10/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 (85/100 vs 22/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Nokia C300 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (59/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia C300 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 by 67 points (91/100 vs 24/100).

What is the rating of the Nokia C300 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Nokia C300 has a MobileRank rating of 24/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Nokia C300 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 10/100).

Which is more powerful: the Nokia C300 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 24/100).

Should you choose the Nokia C300 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Nokia C300 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.