Nokia G42 vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Nokia G42 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $150 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 39/100 (a 52-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 477,542); the Nokia G42 is noticeably lighter (193g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia G42 by 52 points (91/100 vs 39/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia G42
Performance 41
Display 44
Camera 30
Battery 43
Portability 57
Value for money 54
Vivo X300 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94
What makes Nokia G42 better?
  • Lighter: 193g vs 230g
  • Cheaper: $150 vs $950

  • Better portability (57/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 477542
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 746
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 1816
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 20W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 41/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 30/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 44/100)
  • Better value for money (94/100 vs 54/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Nokia G42 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 52 points higher (91/100 vs 39/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 41/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 43/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (94/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia G42 (99/100 vs 41/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia G42 (89/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia G42 (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia G42 (85/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia G42 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (57/100 vs 39/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia G42 (94/100 vs 54/100).

Nokia G42: The Nokia G42 is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Nokia G42 Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 477542 4247433
Geekbench Single 746 3640
Geekbench Multi 1816 11033
Display 6.6" IPS LCD 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 720x1612 3168x1440
Refresh rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 20W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 170
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 8 MP 32 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB / 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 13, upgradable to Android 14 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 560 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP69
Dimensions 165.0×75.8×8.6 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 193 g 230 g
Price $150 $950
Camera comparison
Nokia G42
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Nokia G42
  • 6.6" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1612
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
44
display
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Nokia G42
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 20W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Nokia G42 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Nokia G42 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G
39/100
477542 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +88.8%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Nokia G42 by 88.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Nokia G42
$150
Vivo X300 Ultra
$950

Price difference: $800. Nokia G42 is cheaper by $800.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia G42 (99/100 vs 41/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia G42 (89/100 vs 44/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia G42 (96/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia G42 (85/100 vs 43/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Nokia G42 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (57/100 vs 39/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia G42 (94/100 vs 54/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia G42 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia G42 by 52 points (91/100 vs 39/100).

What is the rating of the Nokia G42 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Nokia G42 has a MobileRank rating of 39/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Nokia G42 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 30/100).

Which is more powerful: the Nokia G42 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 41/100).

Should you choose the Nokia G42 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Nokia G42 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.