Nokia C210 vs Oppo Reno6 Lite
The Nokia C210 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, while the Oppo Reno6 Lite (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 662. By overall MobileRank rating, the Oppo Reno6 Lite leads — 40/100 vs 23/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the Oppo Reno6 Lite has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 13 MP vs 48 MP.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia C210
Oppo Reno6 Lite
What makes Nokia C210 better?
- Lighter: 167g vs 175g
- Overall rating 23/100
What makes Oppo Reno6 Lite better?
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 3000 mAh
- Better main camera: 48MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (31/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (46/100 vs 15/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 35/100)
- Better portability (74/100 vs 72/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Nokia C210 vs the Oppo Reno6 Lite, the Oppo Reno6 Lite scores 17 points higher (40/100 vs 23/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno6 Lite leads (31/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno6 Lite leads (46/100 vs 15/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 24/100. In the "display" category, the Oppo Reno6 Lite significantly outperforms the Nokia C210 (84/100 vs 35/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno6 Lite notably outperforms the Nokia C210 (31/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno6 Lite significantly outperforms the Nokia C210 (46/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno6 Lite and the Nokia C210 are nearly equal (74/100 vs 72/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nokia C210 | Oppo Reno6 Lite | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 | |
| AnTuTu | 320666 | 320666 | |
| Geekbench Single | 345 | 345 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1065 | 1065 | |
| Display | 6.3" | 6.4" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1560 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | — | — | |
| Battery | 3000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 33W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 48 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB | 6GB | |
| Storage | 32GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 800 nits | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 159.5×73.9×8.6 mm | 160.3×73.8×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 167 g | 175 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Nokia C210
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Oppo Reno6 Lite
- Main: 48MP f/1.7
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Nokia C210
- 6.3"
- Resolution: 720x1560
- Refresh rate: —
Oppo Reno6 Lite
- 6.4" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Nokia C210
- 3000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Oppo Reno6 Lite
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Nokia C210 and Oppo Reno6 Lite, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 24/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Oppo Reno6 Lite significantly outperforms the Nokia C210 (84/100 vs 35/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno6 Lite notably outperforms the Nokia C210 (31/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno6 Lite significantly outperforms the Nokia C210 (46/100 vs 15/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno6 Lite and the Nokia C210 are nearly equal (74/100 vs 72/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia C210 or the Oppo Reno6 Lite?
The Oppo Reno6 Lite is noticeably better than the Nokia C210 — the overall rating gap is 17 points.
What is the rating of the Nokia C210 and the Oppo Reno6 Lite?
The Nokia C210 has a MobileRank rating of 23/100, the Oppo Reno6 Lite — 40/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia C210 or the Oppo Reno6 Lite?
The Oppo Reno6 Lite leads on camera score (31/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Nokia C210 over the Oppo Reno6 Lite?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is display — better on the Oppo Reno6 Lite (84/100 vs 35/100).