Nokia C210 vs Vivo Y32t
The Nokia C210 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y32t leads — 28/100 vs 23/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y32t has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 3000); the Nokia C210 is faster in AnTuTu (320,666 vs 303,398).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia C210
Vivo Y32t
What makes Nokia C210 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 320666 vs 303398
- Better Geekbench Single: 345 vs 341
- Better Geekbench Multi: 1065 vs 779
- Lighter: 167g vs 179g
- Higher performance (24/100 vs 20/100)
- Better portability (72/100 vs 68/100)
What makes Vivo Y32t better?
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 3000 mAh
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 15/100)
- Better display (39/100 vs 35/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Nokia C210 vs the Vivo Y32t, the Vivo Y32t scores 5 points higher (28/100 vs 23/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t leads (52/100 vs 15/100). In the "performance" category, the Nokia C210 and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (24/100 vs 20/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo Y32t and the Nokia C210 are nearly equal (39/100 vs 35/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the Nokia C210 (52/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia C210 and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (72/100 vs 68/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nokia C210 | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 320666 | 303398 | |
| Geekbench Single | 345 | 341 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1065 | 779 | |
| Display | 6.3" | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 720x1560 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | — | — | |
| Battery | 3000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | — | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB | — | |
| Storage | 32GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 159.5×73.9×8.6 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 167 g | 179 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Nokia C210
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Nokia C210
- 6.3"
- Resolution: 720x1560
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Nokia C210
- 3000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Nokia C210 and Vivo Y32t, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Nokia C210 leads Vivo Y32t by 5.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Nokia C210 and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (24/100 vs 20/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo Y32t and the Nokia C210 are nearly equal (39/100 vs 35/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the Nokia C210 (52/100 vs 15/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nokia C210 and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (72/100 vs 68/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia C210 or the Vivo Y32t?
The Vivo Y32t edges out the Nokia C210 by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Nokia C210 and the Vivo Y32t?
The Nokia C210 has a MobileRank rating of 23/100, the Vivo Y32t — 28/100.
Should you choose the Nokia C210 over the Vivo Y32t?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is battery life — better on the Vivo Y32t (52/100 vs 15/100).