Nokia C210 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Nokia C210 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 23/100 (a 68-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 13 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 320,666); the Vivo X300 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia C210 doesn't; the Nokia C210 is noticeably lighter (167g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia C210
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Nokia C210 better?
- Lighter: 167g vs 230g
- Better portability (72/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 320666
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 345
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 1065
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 3000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 24/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 15/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 35/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Nokia C210 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 68 points higher (91/100 vs 23/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 24/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 15/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C210 (99/100 vs 24/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C210 (89/100 vs 35/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C210 (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C210 (85/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia C210 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (72/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nokia C210 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 320666 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 345 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1065 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.3" | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1560 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 32GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 159.5×73.9×8.6 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 167 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Nokia C210
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Nokia C210
- 6.3"
- Resolution: 720x1560
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Nokia C210
- 3000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Nokia C210 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Nokia C210 by 92.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Nokia C210
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C210 (99/100 vs 24/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C210 (89/100 vs 35/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C210 (96/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C210 (85/100 vs 15/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nokia C210 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (72/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia C210 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C210 by 68 points (91/100 vs 23/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia C210 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Nokia C210 has a MobileRank rating of 23/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia C210 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nokia C210 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 24/100).
Should you choose the Nokia C210 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.