Nokia C12 Pro vs ZTE Axon 40
The Nokia C12 Pro (2023) runs on the Unisoc, while the ZTE Axon 40 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 leads — 58/100 vs 25/100 (a 33-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Axon 40 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 8 MP vs 64 MP; the ZTE Axon 40 has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia C12 Pro doesn't.
Nokia C12 Pro
ZTE Axon 40
- Overall rating 25/100
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4000 mAh
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 8MP
- Better camera (51/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 32/100)
- Better display (73/100 vs 40/100)
- Better portability (53/100 vs 38/100)
Comparing the Nokia C12 Pro vs the ZTE Axon 40, the ZTE Axon 40 scores 33 points higher (58/100 vs 25/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 leads (51/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 leads (52/100 vs 32/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 significantly outperforms the Nokia C12 Pro (73/100 vs 40/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 significantly outperforms the Nokia C12 Pro (51/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 notably outperforms the Nokia C12 Pro (52/100 vs 32/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 notably outperforms the Nokia C12 Pro (53/100 vs 38/100).
| Specification | Nokia C12 Pro | ZTE Axon 40 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.3" IPS LCD | 6.7" | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | — | |
| Main camera | 8 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 44 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB / 3GB | — | |
| Storage | 64GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 12 (Go edition) | Android 12 Snow Cone | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Dimensions | 160.6×74.3×8.8 mm | 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | — | 200 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Nokia C12 Pro
- Main: 8MP
- Front: 5MP
ZTE Axon 40
- Main: 64MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 44MP
Nokia C12 Pro
- 6.3" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
ZTE Axon 40
- 6.7"
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia C12 Pro
- 4000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
ZTE Axon 40
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 significantly outperforms the Nokia C12 Pro (73/100 vs 40/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 significantly outperforms the Nokia C12 Pro (51/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 notably outperforms the Nokia C12 Pro (52/100 vs 32/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 notably outperforms the Nokia C12 Pro (53/100 vs 38/100).
Which is better: the Nokia C12 Pro or the ZTE Axon 40?
The ZTE Axon 40 significantly outperforms the Nokia C12 Pro by 33 points (58/100 vs 25/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia C12 Pro and the ZTE Axon 40?
The Nokia C12 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 25/100, the ZTE Axon 40 — 58/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia C12 Pro or the ZTE Axon 40?
The ZTE Axon 40 leads on camera score (51/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Nokia C12 Pro over the ZTE Axon 40?
The Nokia C12 Pro is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 40 is a better fit for active users.