Nokia C12 Pro vs ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G
The Nokia C12 Pro (2023) runs on the Unisoc, while the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G leads — 61/100 vs 25/100 (a 36-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G has the bigger battery (4200 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 8 MP vs 64 MP; the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia C12 Pro doesn't.
Nokia C12 Pro
ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G
- Longer battery life (32/100 vs 30/100)
- Bigger battery: 4200 vs 4000 mAh
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 8MP
- Better camera (63/100 vs 10/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 40/100)
- Better portability (70/100 vs 38/100)
Comparing the Nokia C12 Pro vs the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G, the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G scores 36 points higher (61/100 vs 25/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G leads (63/100 vs 10/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G significantly outperforms the Nokia C12 Pro (89/100 vs 40/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G significantly outperforms the Nokia C12 Pro (63/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Nokia C12 Pro and the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G are nearly equal (32/100 vs 30/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G significantly outperforms the Nokia C12 Pro (70/100 vs 38/100).
| Specification | Nokia C12 Pro | ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 1119714 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 1488 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 3373 | |
| Display | 6.3" IPS LCD | 6.7" Amoled | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 4200 mAh | |
| Charging | — | — | |
| Main camera | 8 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | — | |
| RAM | 2GB / 3GB | — | |
| Storage | 64GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 12 (Go edition) | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Dimensions | 160.6×74.3×8.8 mm | 163.6×75.3×7.9 mm | |
| Weight | — | 183 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Nokia C12 Pro
- Main: 8MP
- Front: 5MP
ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G
- Main: 64MP
- Ultrawide: 64MP
- Front: —
Nokia C12 Pro
- 6.3" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G
- 6.7" Amoled
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Nokia C12 Pro
- 4000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G
- 4200 mAh
- No wireless charging
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G significantly outperforms the Nokia C12 Pro (89/100 vs 40/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G significantly outperforms the Nokia C12 Pro (63/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Nokia C12 Pro and the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G are nearly equal (32/100 vs 30/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G significantly outperforms the Nokia C12 Pro (70/100 vs 38/100).
Which is better: the Nokia C12 Pro or the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G?
The ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G significantly outperforms the Nokia C12 Pro by 36 points (61/100 vs 25/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia C12 Pro and the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G?
The Nokia C12 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 25/100, the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G — 61/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia C12 Pro or the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G?
The ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G leads on camera score (63/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Nokia C12 Pro over the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G?
The Nokia C12 Pro is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G is a better fit for active users.