Nokia C02 vs Vivo Y53t 5G
The Nokia C02 (2023) runs on the Unisoc SC9832E, while the Vivo Y53t 5G (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 700 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y53t 5G leads — 11/100 vs 5/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y53t 5G has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 5 MP vs 13 MP; the Vivo Y53t 5G is thinner (8.2mm vs 10.0mm).
Nokia C02
Vivo Y53t 5G
- Overall rating 5/100
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 3000 mAh
- Better main camera: 13MP vs 5MP
- Lighter: 186g vs 191g
- Longer battery life (36/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (67/100 vs 61/100)
Comparing the Nokia C02 vs the Vivo Y53t 5G, the Vivo Y53t 5G scores 6 points higher (11/100 vs 5/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y53t 5G leads (36/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y53t 5G significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (36/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo Y53t 5G is a bit better (67/100 vs 61/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Nokia C02 | Vivo Y53t 5G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc SC9832E | MediaTek Dimensity 700 () | |
| AnTuTu | 153667 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 205 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 846 | — | |
| Display | 5.5" IPS LCD | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 720x1440 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | — | — | |
| Battery | 3000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | — | |
| Main camera | 5 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 2 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB | — | |
| Storage | 32GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 12 (Go edition) | Android 13 | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 148.7×71.2×10.0 mm | 75.6×164.1×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 191 g | 186 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Nokia C02
- Main: 5MP
- Front: 2MP
Vivo Y53t 5G
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Nokia C02
- 5.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1440
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo Y53t 5G
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Nokia C02
- 3000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y53t 5G
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y53t 5G significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (36/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo Y53t 5G is a bit better (67/100 vs 61/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Nokia C02 or the Vivo Y53t 5G?
The Vivo Y53t 5G edges out the Nokia C02 by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Nokia C02 and the Vivo Y53t 5G?
The Nokia C02 has a MobileRank rating of 5/100, the Vivo Y53t 5G — 11/100.
Should you choose the Nokia C02 over the Vivo Y53t 5G?
The Nokia C02 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo Y53t 5G is a better fit for everyday use.