Nokia C02 vs Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
The Nokia C02 (2023) runs on the Unisoc SC9832E, while the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 1300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) leads — 31/100 vs 5/100 (a 26-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 5 MP vs 50 MP.
Nokia C02
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- Lighter: 191g vs 203g
- Better design/ergonomics (61/100 vs 46/100)
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 3000 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 5MP
- Better camera (27/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 0/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Nokia C02 vs the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022), the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) scores 26 points higher (31/100 vs 5/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) leads (27/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) leads (51/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) notably outperforms the Nokia C02 (27/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (51/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Nokia C02 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) (61/100 vs 46/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Nokia C02 | Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc SC9832E | MediaTek Dimensity 1300 | |
| AnTuTu | 153667 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 205 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 846 | — | |
| Display | 5.5" IPS LCD | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 720x1440 | 1080x2408 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 44W | |
| Main camera | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 2 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 32GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 12 (Go edition) | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 148.7×71.2×10.0 mm | 163.9×75.3×9.2 mm | |
| Weight | 191 g | 203 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Nokia C02
- Main: 5MP
- Front: 2MP
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Nokia C02
- 5.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1440
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia C02
- 3000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) notably outperforms the Nokia C02 (27/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (51/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Nokia C02 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) (61/100 vs 46/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Nokia C02 or the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)?
The Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 by 26 points (31/100 vs 5/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia C02 and the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)?
The Nokia C02 has a MobileRank rating of 5/100, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) — 31/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia C02 or the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)?
The Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) leads on camera score (27/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Nokia C02 over the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)?
The Nokia C02 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) is a better fit for everyday use.