Nokia C02 vs Vivo iQOO Z7
The Nokia C02 (2023) runs on the Unisoc SC9832E, while the Vivo iQOO Z7 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 920. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Z7 leads — 26/100 vs 5/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z7 has the bigger battery (4500 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 5 MP vs 64 MP; the Vivo iQOO Z7 is noticeably lighter (173g vs 191g).
Nokia C02
Vivo iQOO Z7
- Overall rating 5/100
- Bigger battery: 4500 vs 3000 mAh
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 5MP
- Lighter: 173g vs 191g
- Better camera (37/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (30/100 vs 0/100)
- Better display (50/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (83/100 vs 61/100)
Comparing the Nokia C02 vs the Vivo iQOO Z7, the Vivo iQOO Z7 scores 21 points higher (26/100 vs 5/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 leads (37/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 leads (30/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (37/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (30/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 notably outperforms the Nokia C02 (83/100 vs 61/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Nokia C02 | Vivo iQOO Z7 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc SC9832E | MediaTek Dimensity 920 | |
| AnTuTu | 153667 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 205 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 846 | — | |
| Display | 5.5" IPS LCD | 6.4" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1440 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 3000 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 44W | |
| Main camera | 5 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 2 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 32GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 12 (Go edition) | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Protection | — | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 148.7×71.2×10.0 mm | 158.9×73.5×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 191 g | 173 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Nokia C02
- Main: 5MP
- Front: 2MP
Vivo iQOO Z7
- Main: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Nokia C02
- 5.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1440
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo iQOO Z7
- 6.4" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Nokia C02
- 3000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z7
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (50/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (37/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (30/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 notably outperforms the Nokia C02 (83/100 vs 61/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Nokia C02 or the Vivo iQOO Z7?
The Vivo iQOO Z7 significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 by 21 points (26/100 vs 5/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia C02 and the Vivo iQOO Z7?
The Nokia C02 has a MobileRank rating of 5/100, the Vivo iQOO Z7 — 26/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia C02 or the Vivo iQOO Z7?
The Vivo iQOO Z7 leads on camera score (37/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Nokia C02 over the Vivo iQOO Z7?
The Nokia C02 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO Z7 is a better fit for everyday use.