Nokia C02 vs Vivo Y23 Pro
The Nokia C02 (2023) runs on the Unisoc SC9832E, while the Vivo Y23 Pro (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 1200 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y23 Pro leads — 22/100 vs 5/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y23 Pro has the bigger battery (4300 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 5 MP vs 108 MP; the Vivo Y23 Pro is noticeably lighter (171g vs 191g).
Nokia C02
Vivo Y23 Pro
- Overall rating 5/100
- Bigger battery: 4300 vs 3000 mAh
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 5MP
- Lighter: 171g vs 191g
- Better camera (52/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (19/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (86/100 vs 61/100)
Comparing the Nokia C02 vs the Vivo Y23 Pro, the Vivo Y23 Pro scores 17 points higher (22/100 vs 5/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y23 Pro leads (52/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y23 Pro leads (19/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y23 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (52/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y23 Pro notably outperforms the Nokia C02 (19/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo Y23 Pro notably outperforms the Nokia C02 (86/100 vs 61/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Nokia C02 | Vivo Y23 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc SC9832E | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 () | |
| AnTuTu | 153667 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 205 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 846 | — | |
| Display | 5.5" IPS LCD | 6.6" | |
| Resolution | 720x1440 | 1080x2376 | |
| Refresh rate | — | — | |
| Battery | 3000 mAh | 4300 mAh | |
| Charging | — | — | |
| Main camera | 5 MP | 108 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 2 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB | — | |
| Storage | 32GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 12 (Go edition) | Android 12 Snow Cone | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 148.7×71.2×10.0 mm | 159.5×73.3×7.4 mm | |
| Weight | 191 g | 171 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Nokia C02
- Main: 5MP
- Front: 2MP
Vivo Y23 Pro
- Main: 108MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 50MP
Nokia C02
- 5.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1440
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo Y23 Pro
- 6.6"
- Resolution: 1080x2376
- Refresh rate: —
Nokia C02
- 3000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y23 Pro
- 4300 mAh
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y23 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (52/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y23 Pro notably outperforms the Nokia C02 (19/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo Y23 Pro notably outperforms the Nokia C02 (86/100 vs 61/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Nokia C02 or the Vivo Y23 Pro?
The Vivo Y23 Pro is noticeably better than the Nokia C02 — the overall rating gap is 17 points.
What is the rating of the Nokia C02 and the Vivo Y23 Pro?
The Nokia C02 has a MobileRank rating of 5/100, the Vivo Y23 Pro — 22/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia C02 or the Vivo Y23 Pro?
The Vivo Y23 Pro leads on camera score (52/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Nokia C02 over the Vivo Y23 Pro?
The Nokia C02 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo Y23 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.