Nokia C02 vs Vivo Y32t
The Nokia C02 (2023) runs on the Unisoc SC9832E, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y32t leads — 11/100 vs 5/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y32t has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 5 MP vs 13 MP; the Vivo Y32t is thinner (8.3mm vs 10.0mm).
Nokia C02
Vivo Y32t
- Overall rating 5/100
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 3000 mAh
- Better main camera: 13MP vs 5MP
- Lighter: 179g vs 191g
- Longer battery life (36/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (76/100 vs 61/100)
Comparing the Nokia C02 vs the Vivo Y32t, the Vivo Y32t scores 6 points higher (11/100 vs 5/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t leads (36/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (36/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Nokia C02 (76/100 vs 61/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Nokia C02 | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc SC9832E | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 153667 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 205 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 846 | — | |
| Display | 5.5" IPS LCD | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 720x1440 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | — | — | |
| Battery | 3000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | — | |
| Main camera | 5 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 2 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB | — | |
| Storage | 32GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 12 (Go edition) | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 148.7×71.2×10.0 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 191 g | 179 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Nokia C02
- Main: 5MP
- Front: 2MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Nokia C02
- 5.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1440
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Nokia C02
- 3000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (36/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Nokia C02 (76/100 vs 61/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Nokia C02 or the Vivo Y32t?
The Vivo Y32t edges out the Nokia C02 by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Nokia C02 and the Vivo Y32t?
The Nokia C02 has a MobileRank rating of 5/100, the Vivo Y32t — 11/100.
Should you choose the Nokia C02 over the Vivo Y32t?
The Nokia C02 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use.