Nokia 2.4 vs Vivo Y32t
The Nokia 2.4 (2020) runs on the MediaTek Helio P22, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y32t leads — 28/100 vs 23/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y32t has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4500); the Vivo Y32t is faster in AnTuTu (303,398 vs 177,554); the Nokia 2.4 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y32t doesn't; the Vivo Y32t is noticeably lighter (179g vs 195g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia 2.4
Vivo Y32t
What makes Nokia 2.4 better?
- Overall rating 23/100
What makes Vivo Y32t better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 303398 vs 177554
- Better Geekbench Single: 341 vs 233
- Better Geekbench Multi: 779 vs 723
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
- Lighter: 179g vs 195g
- Higher performance (20/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 49/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 54/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Nokia 2.4 vs the Vivo Y32t, the Vivo Y32t scores 5 points higher (28/100 vs 23/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y32t leads (20/100 vs 10/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (20/100 vs 10/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 39/100. In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t and the Nokia 2.4 are nearly equal (52/100 vs 49/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (68/100 vs 54/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nokia 2.4 | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio P22 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 177554 | 303398 | |
| Geekbench Single | 233 | 341 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 723 | 779 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | — | — | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | — | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB / 3GB | — | |
| Storage | 32GB / 64GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 10, planned upgrade to Android 11 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 165.9×76.3×8.7 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 195 g | 179 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Nokia 2.4
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Nokia 2.4
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Nokia 2.4
- 4500 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Nokia 2.4 and Vivo Y32t, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo Y32t leads Nokia 2.4 by 41.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (20/100 vs 10/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 39/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t and the Nokia 2.4 are nearly equal (52/100 vs 49/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (68/100 vs 54/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia 2.4 or the Vivo Y32t?
The Vivo Y32t edges out the Nokia 2.4 by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Nokia 2.4 and the Vivo Y32t?
The Nokia 2.4 has a MobileRank rating of 23/100, the Vivo Y32t — 28/100.
Which is more powerful: the Nokia 2.4 or the Vivo Y32t?
The Vivo Y32t leads on performance (20/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Nokia 2.4 over the Vivo Y32t?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is portability — better on the Vivo Y32t (68/100 vs 54/100).