Nokia 2.4 vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Nokia 2.4 (2020) runs on the MediaTek Helio P22, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 22/100 (a 69-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 13 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 156,818); the Nokia 2.4 is noticeably lighter (195g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 2.4 by 69 points (91/100 vs 22/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia 2.4
Performance 8
Display 39
Camera 10
Battery 49
Portability 54
Value for money
Vivo X300 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 86
What makes Nokia 2.4 better?
  • Lighter: 195g vs 230g

  • Better portability (54/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 156818
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 233
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 723
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4500 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 8/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 10/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 49/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 39/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Nokia 2.4 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 69 points higher (91/100 vs 22/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 8/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 49/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 2.4 (99/100 vs 8/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 2.4 (89/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 2.4 (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 2.4 (85/100 vs 49/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia 2.4 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (54/100 vs 39/100).

Nokia 2.4: The Nokia 2.4 is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Nokia 2.4 Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor MediaTek Helio P22 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 156818 4247433
Geekbench Single 233 3640
Geekbench Multi 723 11033
Display 6.5" IPS LCD 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 720x1600 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz
Battery 4500 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 100W
Wireless charging 40W
DXOMark (camera) 170
Main camera 13 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 5 MP 32 MP
RAM 2GB / 3GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 32GB / 64GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 10, planned upgrade to Android 11 Android 16
NFC yes yes
Protection IP69
Dimensions 165.9×76.3×8.7 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 195 g 230 g
Price $10498
Camera comparison
Nokia 2.4
  • Main: 13MP
  • Front: 5MP
10
camera
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Nokia 2.4
  • 6.5" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: —
39
display
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Nokia 2.4
  • 4500 mAh
  • Wireless charging: no data
49
battery
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Nokia 2.4 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Nokia 2.4 MediaTek Helio P22
22/100
156818 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +96.3%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Nokia 2.4 by 96.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Nokia 2.4
Price unknown
Vivo X300 Ultra
$10498
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 2.4 (99/100 vs 8/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 2.4 (89/100 vs 39/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 2.4 (96/100 vs 10/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 2.4 (85/100 vs 49/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Nokia 2.4 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (54/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia 2.4 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 2.4 by 69 points (91/100 vs 22/100).

What is the rating of the Nokia 2.4 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Nokia 2.4 has a MobileRank rating of 22/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Nokia 2.4 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 10/100).

Which is more powerful: the Nokia 2.4 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 8/100).

Should you choose the Nokia 2.4 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Nokia 2.4 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.