Honor Play 3e vs Nokia 2.4
The Honor Play 3e (2019) runs on the MediaTek Helio P22, while the Nokia 2.4 (2020) runs on the MediaTek Helio P22. By overall MobileRank rating, the Nokia 2.4 leads — 23/100 vs 19/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Nokia 2.4 has the bigger battery (4500 mAh vs 3020); the Nokia 2.4 has NFC for contactless payments, the Honor Play 3e doesn't; the Honor Play 3e is noticeably lighter (146g vs 195g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Play 3e
Nokia 2.4
What makes Honor Play 3e better?
- Lighter: 146g vs 195g
- Better display (42/100 vs 39/100)
- Better portability (78/100 vs 54/100)
What makes Nokia 2.4 better?
- Bigger battery: 4500 vs 3020 mAh
- Longer battery life (49/100 vs 15/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Play 3e vs the Nokia 2.4, the Nokia 2.4 scores 4 points higher (23/100 vs 19/100). In the "battery" category, the Nokia 2.4 leads (49/100 vs 15/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100. In the "display" category, the Honor Play 3e and the Nokia 2.4 are nearly equal (42/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100. In the "battery" category, the Nokia 2.4 significantly outperforms the Honor Play 3e (49/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor Play 3e notably outperforms the Nokia 2.4 (78/100 vs 54/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Play 3e | Nokia 2.4 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio P22 | MediaTek Helio P22 | |
| AnTuTu | 177554 | 177554 | |
| Geekbench Single | 233 | 233 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 723 | 723 | |
| Display | 5.7" IPS LCD | 6.5" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 720x1520 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | — | — | |
| Battery | 3020 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | — | — | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB / 3GB | 2GB / 3GB | |
| Storage | 32GB / 64GB | 32GB / 64GB | |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie); EMUI 9.1 | Android 10, planned upgrade to Android 11 | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Dimensions | 147.1×70.8×8.5 mm | 165.9×76.3×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 146 g | 195 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Honor Play 3e
- Main: 13MP f/1.8
- Front: 5MP
Nokia 2.4
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Display comparison
Honor Play 3e
- 5.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1520
- Refresh rate: —
Nokia 2.4
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Honor Play 3e
- 3020 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Nokia 2.4
- 4500 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Play 3e and Nokia 2.4, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Honor Play 3e and the Nokia 2.4 are nearly equal (42/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Nokia 2.4 significantly outperforms the Honor Play 3e (49/100 vs 15/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor Play 3e notably outperforms the Nokia 2.4 (78/100 vs 54/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Play 3e or the Nokia 2.4?
The Nokia 2.4 edges out the Honor Play 3e by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor Play 3e and the Nokia 2.4?
The Honor Play 3e has a MobileRank rating of 19/100, the Nokia 2.4 — 23/100.
Should you choose the Honor Play 3e over the Nokia 2.4?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is battery life — better on the Nokia 2.4 (49/100 vs 15/100).