Motorola Signature vs Sharp Aquos R9 Pro
The Motorola Signature (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Signature leads — 86/100 vs 76/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Signature has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Signature is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 1,797,821); the Motorola Signature is noticeably lighter (186g vs 229g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Signature
Sharp Aquos R9 Pro
What makes Motorola Signature better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 1797821
- Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 1923
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 5179
- Bigger battery: 5200 vs 5000 mAh
- Lighter: 186g vs 229g
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 75/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 81/100)
- Longer battery life (77/100 vs 66/100)
- Better portability (78/100 vs 27/100)
What makes Sharp Aquos R9 Pro better?
- Higher refresh rate: 240Hz vs 120Hz
- Better display (99/100 vs 84/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Signature vs the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro, the Motorola Signature scores 10 points higher (86/100 vs 76/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Signature leads (90/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Signature leads (91/100 vs 81/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Signature leads (77/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Signature notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro (90/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Signature (99/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Signature is a bit better (91/100 vs 81/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Signature is a bit better (77/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro (78/100 vs 27/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Signature | Sharp Aquos R9 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | |
| AnTuTu | 3057215 | 1797821 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2833 | 1923 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9119 | 5179 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.7" PRO IGZO LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1264x2780 | 1440x3120 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 240 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | — | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 162.1×76.4×7.0 mm | 162.0×78.0×9.3 mm | |
| Weight | 186 g | 229 g | |
| Launch price | $699 | — |
Camera comparison
Motorola Signature
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Sharp Aquos R9 Pro
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Motorola Signature
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1264x2780
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Sharp Aquos R9 Pro
- 6.7" PRO IGZO LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1440x3120
- Refresh rate: 240 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Signature
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 50W
Sharp Aquos R9 Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wireless: supported, wattage unknown
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Signature and Sharp Aquos R9 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Signature leads Sharp Aquos R9 Pro by 70.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Sharp Aquos R9 Pro
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Signature notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro (90/100 vs 75/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Signature (99/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Signature is a bit better (91/100 vs 81/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Signature is a bit better (77/100 vs 66/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro (78/100 vs 27/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Signature or the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro?
The Motorola Signature is noticeably better than the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Signature and the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro?
The Motorola Signature has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro — 76/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Signature or the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro?
The Motorola Signature leads on camera score (91/100 vs 81/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Signature or the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro?
The Motorola Signature leads on performance (90/100 vs 75/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Signature over the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro?
The Motorola Signature is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Sharp Aquos R9 Pro is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.