Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Sharp Aquos R9 Pro
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads — 78/100 vs 76/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is faster in AnTuTu (3,379,591 vs 1,797,821); the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is noticeably lighter (199g vs 229g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Sharp Aquos R9 Pro
What makes Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3379591 vs 1797821
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1923
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 5179
- Lighter: 199g vs 229g
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 75/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 27/100)
What makes Sharp Aquos R9 Pro better?
- Higher refresh rate: 240Hz vs 165Hz
- Better camera (81/100 vs 60/100)
- Longer battery life (66/100 vs 64/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 95/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 scores 2 points higher (78/100 vs 76/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (92/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro leads (81/100 vs 60/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro (92/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro and the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 are nearly equal (99/100 vs 95/100). In the "camera" category, the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (81/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro and the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 are nearly equal (66/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro (68/100 vs 27/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 | Sharp Aquos R9 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | |
| AnTuTu | 3379591 | 1797821 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 1923 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 5179 | |
| Display | 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.7" PRO IGZO LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1440x3120 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 240 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 162.0×78.0×9.3 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 229 g | |
| Launch price | $1499 | — |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Sharp Aquos R9 Pro
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Sharp Aquos R9 Pro
- 6.7" PRO IGZO LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1440x3120
- Refresh rate: 240 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Sharp Aquos R9 Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wireless: supported, wattage unknown
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and Sharp Aquos R9 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads Sharp Aquos R9 Pro by 88.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Sharp Aquos R9 Pro
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro (92/100 vs 75/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro and the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 are nearly equal (99/100 vs 95/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (81/100 vs 60/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro and the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 are nearly equal (66/100 vs 64/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro (68/100 vs 27/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 edges out the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro — 76/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro?
The Sharp Aquos R9 Pro leads on camera score (81/100 vs 60/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on performance (92/100 vs 75/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 over the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Sharp Aquos R9 Pro is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.