Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Sharp Aquos R9
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Sharp Aquos R9 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3; launch prices were $1499 and $599. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads — 78/100 vs 68/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is faster in AnTuTu (3,379,591 vs 1,660,924); the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is thinner (7.2mm vs 8.9mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Sharp Aquos R9
What makes Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3379591 vs 1660924
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1860
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 5045
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 74/100)
- Longer battery life (64/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 90/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 52/100)
What makes Sharp Aquos R9 better?
- Higher refresh rate: 240Hz vs 165Hz
- Lighter: 195g vs 199g
- Cheaper at launch: $599 vs $1499
- Overall rating 68/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs the Sharp Aquos R9, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 scores 10 points higher (78/100 vs 68/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (92/100 vs 74/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (64/100 vs 52/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 — 66/100, Sharp Aquos R9 — 50/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 (92/100 vs 74/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (95/100 vs 90/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 60/100. In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (64/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 (68/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 | Sharp Aquos R9 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 | |
| AnTuTu | 3379591 | 1660924 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 1860 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 5045 | |
| Display | 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.5" PRO IGZO LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 240 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 2000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 156.0×75.0×8.9 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 195 g | |
| Launch price | $1499 | $599 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Sharp Aquos R9
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Sharp Aquos R9
- 6.5" PRO IGZO LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 240 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Sharp Aquos R9
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and Sharp Aquos R9, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads Sharp Aquos R9 by 103.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $900. Sharp Aquos R9 was $900 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 (92/100 vs 74/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (95/100 vs 90/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 60/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (64/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 (68/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Sharp Aquos R9?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is noticeably better than the Sharp Aquos R9 — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Sharp Aquos R9?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Sharp Aquos R9 — 68/100.
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Sharp Aquos R9?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on performance (92/100 vs 74/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 over the Sharp Aquos R9?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Sharp Aquos R9 is a better fit for active users.