Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Sharp Aquos R9
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Sharp Aquos R9 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3; launch prices were $1099 and $599. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 68/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the Sharp Aquos R9 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4700); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (2,962,094 vs 1,660,924); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is thinner (7.2mm vs 8.9mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Sharp Aquos R9
What makes Motorola Razr 60 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2962094 vs 1660924
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1860
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 5045
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 74/100)
- Longer battery life (58/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 90/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 52/100)
What makes Sharp Aquos R9 better?
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4700 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 240Hz vs 165Hz
- Lighter: 195g vs 199g
- Cheaper at launch: $599 vs $1099
- Better camera (60/100 vs 57/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Sharp Aquos R9, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 8 points higher (76/100 vs 68/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (91/100 vs 74/100). Value score: Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — 62/100, Sharp Aquos R9 — 50/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 (91/100 vs 74/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Sharp Aquos R9 are nearly equal (94/100 vs 90/100). In the "camera" category, the Sharp Aquos R9 and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra are nearly equal (60/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (58/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 (68/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Sharp Aquos R9 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 | |
| AnTuTu | 2962094 | 1660924 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 1860 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 5045 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.5" PRO IGZO LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 240 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 2000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 156.0×75.0×8.9 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 195 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | $599 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Sharp Aquos R9
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Sharp Aquos R9
- 6.5" PRO IGZO LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 240 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Sharp Aquos R9
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Sharp Aquos R9, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Sharp Aquos R9 by 78.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $500. Sharp Aquos R9 was $500 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 (91/100 vs 74/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Sharp Aquos R9 are nearly equal (94/100 vs 90/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Sharp Aquos R9 and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra are nearly equal (60/100 vs 57/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (58/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 (68/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Sharp Aquos R9?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra edges out the Sharp Aquos R9 by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Sharp Aquos R9?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Sharp Aquos R9 — 68/100.
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Sharp Aquos R9?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on performance (91/100 vs 74/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Sharp Aquos R9?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Sharp Aquos R9 is a better fit for active users.