Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Sharp Aquos R9 Pro
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3. Both devices score the same overall rating of 76/100. Key differences: the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4700); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (2,962,094 vs 1,797,821); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is noticeably lighter (199g vs 229g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Sharp Aquos R9 Pro
What makes Motorola Razr 60 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2962094 vs 1797821
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1923
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 5179
- Lighter: 199g vs 229g
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 75/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 27/100)
What makes Sharp Aquos R9 Pro better?
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4700 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 240Hz vs 165Hz
- Better camera (81/100 vs 57/100)
- Longer battery life (66/100 vs 58/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 94/100)
Comparison verdict
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro received the same MobileRank rating — 76/100. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (91/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro leads (81/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro (91/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro is a bit better (99/100 vs 94/100). In the "camera" category, the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (81/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro is a bit better (66/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro (68/100 vs 27/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Sharp Aquos R9 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | |
| AnTuTu | 2962094 | 1797821 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 1923 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 5179 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.7" PRO IGZO LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 1440x3120 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 240 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 162.0×78.0×9.3 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 229 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | — |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Sharp Aquos R9 Pro
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Sharp Aquos R9 Pro
- 6.7" PRO IGZO LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1440x3120
- Refresh rate: 240 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Sharp Aquos R9 Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wireless: supported, wattage unknown
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Sharp Aquos R9 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Sharp Aquos R9 Pro by 64.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Sharp Aquos R9 Pro
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro (91/100 vs 75/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro is a bit better (99/100 vs 94/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (81/100 vs 57/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro is a bit better (66/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro (68/100 vs 27/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro?
Both devices scored 76/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (91/100 vs 75/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro — 76/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro?
The Sharp Aquos R9 Pro leads on camera score (81/100 vs 57/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on performance (91/100 vs 75/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Sharp Aquos R9 Pro is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.