Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Sharp Aquos R10

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Sharp Aquos R10 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 66/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Sharp Aquos R10 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4700); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (2,962,094 vs 1,660,924); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is thinner (7.2mm vs 8.9mm).

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is noticeably better than the Sharp Aquos R10 — the overall rating gap is 10 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra

Performance 91
Display 94
Camera 57
Battery 58
Portability 68
Value for money 62

Sharp Aquos R10

Performance 74
Display 90
Camera 60
Battery 46
Portability 51
Value for money —

What makes Motorola Razr 60 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 2962094 vs 1660924
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1860
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 5045
  • Faster charging: 68W vs 36W

  • Higher performance (91/100 vs 74/100)
  • Longer battery life (58/100 vs 46/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 90/100)
  • Better portability (68/100 vs 51/100)

What makes Sharp Aquos R10 better?

  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4700 mAh
  • Higher refresh rate: 240Hz vs 165Hz
  • Lighter: 197g vs 199g

  • Better camera (60/100 vs 57/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Sharp Aquos R10, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 10 points higher (76/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (91/100 vs 74/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (58/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R10 (91/100 vs 74/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Sharp Aquos R10 are nearly equal (94/100 vs 90/100). In the "camera" category, the Sharp Aquos R10 and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra are nearly equal (60/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (58/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R10 (68/100 vs 51/100).

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra: The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Sharp Aquos R10: The Sharp Aquos R10 is a better fit for active users.

Specs comparison

Specification Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Sharp Aquos R10
Processor Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
AnTuTu 2962094 1660924
Geekbench Single 3013 1860
Geekbench Multi 9287 5045
Display 7.0" pOLED 6.5" PRO IGZO LTPO OLED
Resolution 1224x2912 1080x2340
Refresh rate 165 Hz 240 Hz
Battery 4700 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 68W 36W
Wireless charging 30W 0W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Front camera 32 MP 50 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 15 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits 3000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP68
Dimensions 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm 156.0×75.0×8.9 mm
Weight 199 g 197 g
Launch price $1099 —

Camera comparison

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
57
camera

Sharp Aquos R10

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
60
camera

Display comparison

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra

  • 7.0" pOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2912
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
94
display

Sharp Aquos R10

  • 6.5" PRO IGZO LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 240 Hz
90
display

Battery and charging

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra

  • 4700 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 30W
58
battery

Sharp Aquos R10

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 36W
  • No wireless charging
46
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Sharp Aquos R10, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Snapdragon 8 Elite
76/100
2962094 AnTuTu
Sharp Aquos R10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
66/100 -78.3%
1660924 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Sharp Aquos R10 by 78.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra

$1099

Sharp Aquos R10

Price unknown

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R10 (91/100 vs 74/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Sharp Aquos R10 are nearly equal (94/100 vs 90/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Sharp Aquos R10 and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra are nearly equal (60/100 vs 57/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (58/100 vs 46/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R10 (68/100 vs 51/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Sharp Aquos R10?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is noticeably better than the Sharp Aquos R10 — the overall rating gap is 10 points.

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Sharp Aquos R10?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Sharp Aquos R10 — 66/100.

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Sharp Aquos R10?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on performance (91/100 vs 74/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Sharp Aquos R10?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Sharp Aquos R10 is a better fit for active users.