Motorola Signature vs Sharp Aquos R10
The Motorola Signature (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the Sharp Aquos R10 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Signature leads — 86/100 vs 66/100 (a 20-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Signature has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Signature is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 1,660,924); the Motorola Signature is thinner (7.0mm vs 8.9mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Signature
Sharp Aquos R10
What makes Motorola Signature better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 1660924
- Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 1860
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 5045
- Bigger battery: 5200 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 36W
- Lighter: 186g vs 197g
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 74/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 60/100)
- Longer battery life (77/100 vs 46/100)
- Better portability (78/100 vs 51/100)
What makes Sharp Aquos R10 better?
- Higher refresh rate: 240Hz vs 120Hz
- Better display (90/100 vs 84/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Signature vs the Sharp Aquos R10, the Motorola Signature scores 20 points higher (86/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Signature leads (90/100 vs 74/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Signature leads (91/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Signature leads (77/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Signature notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R10 (90/100 vs 74/100). In the "display" category, the Sharp Aquos R10 is a bit better (90/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R10 (91/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R10 (77/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Signature notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R10 (78/100 vs 51/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Signature | Sharp Aquos R10 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 | |
| AnTuTu | 3057215 | 1660924 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2833 | 1860 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9119 | 5045 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.5" PRO IGZO LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1264x2780 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 240 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 36W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 3000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 162.1×76.4×7.0 mm | 156.0×75.0×8.9 mm | |
| Weight | 186 g | 197 g | |
| Launch price | $699 | — |
Camera comparison
Motorola Signature
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Sharp Aquos R10
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Motorola Signature
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1264x2780
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Sharp Aquos R10
- 6.5" PRO IGZO LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 240 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Signature
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 50W
Sharp Aquos R10
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 36W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Signature and Sharp Aquos R10, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Signature leads Sharp Aquos R10 by 84.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Sharp Aquos R10
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Signature notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R10 (90/100 vs 74/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Sharp Aquos R10 is a bit better (90/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R10 (91/100 vs 60/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R10 (77/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Signature notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R10 (78/100 vs 51/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Signature or the Sharp Aquos R10?
The Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R10 by 20 points (86/100 vs 66/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Signature and the Sharp Aquos R10?
The Motorola Signature has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Sharp Aquos R10 — 66/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Signature or the Sharp Aquos R10?
The Motorola Signature leads on camera score (91/100 vs 60/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Signature or the Sharp Aquos R10?
The Motorola Signature leads on performance (90/100 vs 74/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Signature over the Sharp Aquos R10?
The Motorola Signature is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Sharp Aquos R10 is a better fit for active users.