Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs Poco C85 4G
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the Poco C85 4G (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra. By overall MobileRank rating, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads — 50/100 vs 38/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the Poco C85 4G has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is faster in AnTuTu (693,978 vs 358,608); the Poco C85 4G has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 doesn't; the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably lighter (174g vs 205g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
Poco C85 4G
What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 693978 vs 358608
- Better Geekbench Single: 1037 vs 432
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2386 vs 1416
- Lighter: 174g vs 205g
- Higher performance (51/100 vs 30/100)
- Better display (79/100 vs 55/100)
- Better portability (79/100 vs 56/100)
What makes Poco C85 4G better?
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Longer battery life (53/100 vs 46/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs the Poco C85 4G, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 scores 12 points higher (50/100 vs 38/100). In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads (51/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Poco C85 4G (51/100 vs 30/100). In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Poco C85 4G (79/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100. In the "battery" category, the Poco C85 4G is a bit better (53/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Poco C85 4G (79/100 vs 56/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Blaze Amoled 2 | Poco C85 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra | |
| AnTuTu | 693978 | 358608 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1037 | 432 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2386 | 1416 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.9" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 33W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15, HyperOS 2 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | 810 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm | 171.6×79.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 174 g | 205 g | |
| Launch price | $139 | — |
Camera comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Poco C85 4G
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco C85 4G
- 6.9" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Poco C85 4G
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and Poco C85 4G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads Poco C85 4G by 93.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Poco C85 4G
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Poco C85 4G (51/100 vs 30/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Poco C85 4G (79/100 vs 55/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco C85 4G is a bit better (53/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Poco C85 4G (79/100 vs 56/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Poco C85 4G?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably better than the Poco C85 4G — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the Poco C85 4G?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Poco C85 4G — 38/100.
Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Poco C85 4G?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads on performance (51/100 vs 30/100).
Should you choose the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 over the Poco C85 4G?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.