Lava Virat Curve 5G vs Poco C85 4G
The Lava Virat Curve 5G (2026) runs on the Dimensity 7100, while the Poco C85 4G (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra. By overall MobileRank rating, the Lava Virat Curve 5G leads — 52/100 vs 38/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the Lava Virat Curve 5G is faster in AnTuTu (785,352 vs 358,608).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Virat Curve 5G
Poco C85 4G
What makes Lava Virat Curve 5G better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 785352 vs 358608
- Better Geekbench Single: 995 vs 432
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2925 vs 1416
- Faster charging: 45W vs 33W
- Higher performance (54/100 vs 30/100)
- Better camera (31/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (56/100 vs 53/100)
- Better display (79/100 vs 55/100)
What makes Poco C85 4G better?
- Overall rating 38/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Virat Curve 5G vs the Poco C85 4G, the Lava Virat Curve 5G scores 14 points higher (52/100 vs 38/100). In the "performance" category, the Lava Virat Curve 5G leads (54/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the Lava Virat Curve 5G notably outperforms the Poco C85 4G (54/100 vs 30/100). In the "display" category, the Lava Virat Curve 5G notably outperforms the Poco C85 4G (79/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Lava Virat Curve 5G and the Poco C85 4G are nearly equal (31/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Lava Virat Curve 5G and the Poco C85 4G are nearly equal (56/100 vs 53/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Virat Curve 5G | Poco C85 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 7100 | MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra | |
| AnTuTu | 785352 | 358608 | |
| Geekbench Single | 995 | 432 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2925 | 1416 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.9" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 33W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15, HyperOS 2 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1100 nits | 810 nits | |
| NFC | — | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | — | 171.6×79.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | — | 205 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Lava Virat Curve 5G
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 13MP
Poco C85 4G
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Lava Virat Curve 5G
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco C85 4G
- 6.9" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Virat Curve 5G
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Poco C85 4G
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Virat Curve 5G and Poco C85 4G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Lava Virat Curve 5G leads Poco C85 4G by 119.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Lava Virat Curve 5G notably outperforms the Poco C85 4G (54/100 vs 30/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Lava Virat Curve 5G notably outperforms the Poco C85 4G (79/100 vs 55/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Lava Virat Curve 5G and the Poco C85 4G are nearly equal (31/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Lava Virat Curve 5G and the Poco C85 4G are nearly equal (56/100 vs 53/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Virat Curve 5G or the Poco C85 4G?
The Lava Virat Curve 5G is noticeably better than the Poco C85 4G — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
What is the rating of the Lava Virat Curve 5G and the Poco C85 4G?
The Lava Virat Curve 5G has a MobileRank rating of 52/100, the Poco C85 4G — 38/100.
Which is more powerful: the Lava Virat Curve 5G or the Poco C85 4G?
The Lava Virat Curve 5G leads on performance (54/100 vs 30/100).
Should you choose the Lava Virat Curve 5G over the Poco C85 4G?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is performance — better on the Lava Virat Curve 5G (54/100 vs 30/100).